So Congress could retrocede most of DC to Maryland, but retain jurisdiction, and grant Washingtonians federal election rights in Maryland, without making them subject to Maryland taxation, law, or rights to participate in Maryland State elections.

But the current legislation does not propose giving DC representation on the basis of it being a State, or even the equivalent of a State (at least as a matter of law), but rather under terms of Article I, Section 8 granting Congress the right to exercise exclusive jurisdiction.

Then George Poindexter of Mississippi Territory suggested popular election to the House and on
9 January 1808, the electors of Mississippi Territory received the privilege of electing their
delegated to Congress at the same election they
elected representives to the territorial House. [Laws of Congress, 10th Congress, 1st sess. pp. 14 - 16].

This leads me to the remainder of the Territory of
Michigan and Territory of Hawaii. While I can not
see a population could ever hit the mark in the
remainder of the Territory of Hawaii to obtain a delegate to Congress. I do see the
population numbers in the near future of the remainder of the Territory of Michigan, that they could have the population in to get a delegate to Congress again. {By the remainder of
the Territory of Michigan, most of that remainders
are on islands in the Pacific Ocean named the Washington Islands. Which are part of a United States territorial dispute with the government of British Columbia, a la, W.A.C. “Wacky” Bennett views.} {Palmyra Island is most of the remainder of the Territory of Hawaii.}

Sincerely, Mark Seidenberg, Vice Chairman, American Independent Party

In regards to the House size, a while back Rep. Hastings from Florida introduced a bill that would establish a commission that would evaluate the size of the House and the method of election.

Up until 1920, the House grew in accordance with the decennial census information. A bill was introduced to increase the size to 483 members, but was ultimately capped at 435 by the passage of “The Permanent Apportionment Act of 1929″. Makes you think how large our delegations would be today!

Some positive stuff –

Uniform definition of Elector-Voter in ALL parts of the U.S.A.
Equal nominating petitions for ballot access.
P.R. in all legislative bodies.
A.V. in all nonpartisan executive/judicial offices.

Much too difficult for the genius folks who know all the history trivia stuff connected with the regime ???

For the clueless – the ENTIRE regime is a gerrymander timebomb — full of super-leftwing and super-rightwing MONSTERS in the gerrymander Congress and in every gerrymander State legislature.

Apparently border to border white suburbia of Mary Land does not want DC back as a county. But DC residents with representation and none in Guam, PR, and else where? We are a screwed up little not quite federalist, not quite nationalist, not quite states rights, not quite populist community!

On your second point, it would certainly “adjust” the number of Presidential Electors. With enough Electors given to DC the rest of the country could skip the election.

Perhaps, we need a constitutional convention to start over. The Supreme Courts seem to have made a gooey mess out of the old Constitution.