<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Updated Presidential Vote Totals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/12/06/updated-presidential-vote-totals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/12/06/updated-presidential-vote-totals/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 04:27:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=6424</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Riley</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/12/06/updated-presidential-vote-totals/comment-page-1/#comment-586951</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Riley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 19:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4407#comment-586951</guid>
		<description>The Travis County results are in alphabetical order (Allen, Baldwin, ..., Nader), it appears that these were directly transcribed into the results for the SoS which uses a different order.

I checked Harris County, which used a 3rd ordering, and these do match the SoS results.

The rest of the county results look pretty reasonable, with Nader and Baldwin receiving the most votes in most counties, with Nader doing better in urban counties, and Baldwin better in suburban or areas outside the larger metropolitan areas.  Keyes and McKinney got their votes mostly in Republican and Democratic areas, respectively.  

Hill did have some good results in the counties around where he lives (and where there were newspaper articles about the local man running for President), with about 1/3 of his statewide total from Washington, Fayette, Austin, and Colorado counties.

A curiosity is that Travis County reported cumulative votes for uncertified write-ins.  There were 2174 vs. 1786 for the 7 declared candidates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Travis County results are in alphabetical order (Allen, Baldwin, &#8230;, Nader), it appears that these were directly transcribed into the results for the SoS which uses a different order.</p>
<p>I checked Harris County, which used a 3rd ordering, and these do match the SoS results.</p>
<p>The rest of the county results look pretty reasonable, with Nader and Baldwin receiving the most votes in most counties, with Nader doing better in urban counties, and Baldwin better in suburban or areas outside the larger metropolitan areas.  Keyes and McKinney got their votes mostly in Republican and Democratic areas, respectively.  </p>
<p>Hill did have some good results in the counties around where he lives (and where there were newspaper articles about the local man running for President), with about 1/3 of his statewide total from Washington, Fayette, Austin, and Colorado counties.</p>
<p>A curiosity is that Travis County reported cumulative votes for uncertified write-ins.  There were 2174 vs. 1786 for the 7 declared candidates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/12/06/updated-presidential-vote-totals/comment-page-1/#comment-586935</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 19:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4407#comment-586935</guid>
		<description>Texas will correct the Travis totals soon, here&#039;s the difference between the actual total and the posted total

Baldwin +656, Hill -660, Allen +4, Keyes 0, Nader +537, McKinney +238, Moore -775</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Texas will correct the Travis totals soon, here&#8217;s the difference between the actual total and the posted total</p>
<p>Baldwin +656, Hill -660, Allen +4, Keyes 0, Nader +537, McKinney +238, Moore -775</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/12/06/updated-presidential-vote-totals/comment-page-1/#comment-586753</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 16:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4407#comment-586753</guid>
		<description>Florida has already correct the Nettles vote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Florida has already correct the Nettles vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PTK</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/12/06/updated-presidential-vote-totals/comment-page-1/#comment-586708</link>
		<dc:creator>PTK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 14:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4407#comment-586708</guid>
		<description>According to D.C political report, Hill got at least 0.01% of the vote in Texas and Nettles got 4267 votes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to D.C political report, Hill got at least 0.01% of the vote in Texas and Nettles got 4267 votes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Anon</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/12/06/updated-presidential-vote-totals/comment-page-1/#comment-586560</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 09:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4407#comment-586560</guid>
		<description>The Hill total is ridiculously inflated, but the Texas Secretary of State and the Travis County Elections board haven&#039;t aligned themselves to correct that. The write-in totals in Travis County are not right as reported on the Texas SOS site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Hill total is ridiculously inflated, but the Texas Secretary of State and the Travis County Elections board haven&#8217;t aligned themselves to correct that. The write-in totals in Travis County are not right as reported on the Texas SOS site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

