<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Mexico, North Carolina State Income Tax Forms List Minor Parties</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/12/08/new-mexico-north-carolina-state-income-tax-forms-list-minor-parties/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/12/08/new-mexico-north-carolina-state-income-tax-forms-list-minor-parties/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 03:54:27 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Susan Hogarth</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/12/08/new-mexico-north-carolina-state-income-tax-forms-list-minor-parties/comment-page-1/#comment-589210</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Hogarth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 02:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4412#comment-589210</guid>
		<description>&quot;The Libertarians lost their 13,000 registered voters&quot;

13,008.

Not that I was counting ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Libertarians lost their 13,000 registered voters&#8221;</p>
<p>13,008.</p>
<p>Not that I was counting ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/12/08/new-mexico-north-carolina-state-income-tax-forms-list-minor-parties/comment-page-1/#comment-587839</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 18:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4412#comment-587839</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d propose something different. Have all the states list all parties that were on the ballot this year for the chance to receive money. Let taxpayers be able to split their money between more than 1 party if they like more than 1.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d propose something different. Have all the states list all parties that were on the ballot this year for the chance to receive money. Let taxpayers be able to split their money between more than 1 party if they like more than 1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
