Supreme Court Denies Request for Injunctive Relief in One Eligibility Case
December 8th, 2008On December 8, the U.S. Supreme Court announced that it had denied injunctive relief in Donofrio v Wells, 08A407. It had been filed by a New Jersey voter who believes that Barack Obama does not meet the “natural-born” qualification requirement. No justice made any comments. Thanks to Bill Van Allen for this news.
December 8th, 2008 at 7:43 am
The international civil and political rights organization known as AXJ asks why the Supreme Court will not review this matter. Is it up to the Electoral College and the WE THE PEOPLE Foundation? http://www.axjus.com
December 8th, 2008 at 7:56 am
What more could we expect? Now, let’s continue to tear down the Constitution until we have nothing left. This is a sad day for The United States. Our founding fathers must be rolling over in their graves about now.
December 8th, 2008 at 8:01 am
Slow Poke: Undoubtedly some of the slave-owning founding fathers are rolling over in their graves mat the idea of a black President. So what? Please get off the computer-after all, the founding fathers never imagined the internet either…
December 8th, 2008 at 8:04 am
Philip Berg’s case is still alive. Maybe its dead by the time I submit this comment but the god awful journalism we’re subjected to continues.
Google “Operation Mockingbird”
December 8th, 2008 at 8:16 am
What a joke. They can hand the Presidency to Bushie and they can rule that your house can be taken by your town if they want your land but they refuse to look into anything involving Obama. I guess we can all demand that our college and medical records are sealed and we can travel anywhere even if its against the laws for US citizens. Now we can travel to Cuba although its against our laws just like Obama traveled to Pakistan in 1981. Great job of subverting our Constitution !!!
December 8th, 2008 at 8:44 am
It was NOT against the law for Americans to travel to Pakistan, in 1981, nor is it now. The State Department ADVISED against it, because Pakistan was a dangerous place then, as it can be today. Anyone was free to ignore those warnings.
As for banning travel to Cuba, how can those who supposedly support Constitutional freedoms tolerate the government dictating where private citizens can travel? Citizens of Canada, germany, france, the UK, etc. can all visit Cuba, yet Americans can’t? Besides, the embargo has been very successful, right? After all Castro is still there, 35 years later.
December 8th, 2008 at 8:45 am
You right-wingers are so right. I’d much rather have the laws and Presidents of this country decided by some tax-evading shyster as opposed to the Supreme Court. Because, as we all know, laywers are the most honest and decent people around, they never have any exterior motives, and they truly want what is best for humanity. Yes, I think I’ll rely on these people to tell me what’s what, and let me know exactly how the world works, who I can point the finger at, and most importantly, how I can avoid paying my taxes. Something every good citizen should know. I can alos feel encouraged to talk about the Constitution, a document I have never read or looked at, as opposed to my new President Barack Obama who has a degree in Constitutional law.
December 8th, 2008 at 9:07 am
just one Obama related order (today) — the NJ case, I don’t believe the CT case was on the order list and the PA, CA, and NY (and TX??) cases have not been given conference dates yet — perhaps they will be all rolled into this coming Friday (Dec 12th) conference — the last of the year and last before the Dec 15 Electoral College date
December 8th, 2008 at 12:07 pm
No. 08A469
Title: Cort Wrotnowski, Applicant
v.
Susan Bysiewicz, Connecticut Secretary of State
Docketed:
Lower Ct: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Case Nos.: (SC 18264)
~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Nov 25 2008 Application (08A469) for stay and/or injunction, submitted to Justice Ginsburg.
Nov 26 2008 Application (08A469) denied by Justice Ginsburg.
Nov 29 2008 Application (08A469) refiled and submitted to Justice Scalia.
Dec 8 2008 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 12, 2008.
Dec 8 2008 Application (08A469) referred to the Court by Justice Scalia.
________________________________________
~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~Phone~~~
Attorneys for Petitioner:
Cort Wrotnowski 1057 North Street (202) 862-8554
Greenwich, CT 06831
Party name: Cort Wrotnowski
Attorneys for Respondent:
Richard Blumenthal Attorney General (860) 808-5316
Office of the Attorney General
55 Elm Street
P.O. Box 120
Hartford, CT 06141-0120
Party name: Susan Bysiewicz, Connecticut Secretary of State
December 8th, 2008 at 12:26 pm
It’s the Congress! If the Congress will not clear up the issue of Mr. Obama’s eligibility, then what are your chances of voting them out in 2010? Not really that good unless you have 435 alternative candidates (Independents or other parties). But what are your chances of that? Not really that good either because the self-entrenched federalist aristocrats have control of ballot access. Do you see a pattern here since the early 20th Century? Suppress the people’s influence by freezing the size of the U.S. House and then monopolizing access to those seats with ballot access restrictions, gerrymandered “safe” seats and campaign finance censorship. Add in corporate control of the mainstream media and you have the people tied down like Gulliver.
December 9th, 2008 at 10:45 am
Q) Is Barack Obama a citizen of the United States?
A) Yes.
Q) Is Barack Obama a natural born citizen of the United States?
A) Yes.
I have a lots of complaints about the Supreme Court when it comes to electoral issues. But, all these lawsuits have just been incredibly silly, stupid and downright embarassing to watch unfold.
December 9th, 2008 at 4:19 pm
Sould President Bush quickly request an Amendment be written that President Elect of the United States must show proof of his/her natural born citizenship before taking office.
December 10th, 2008 at 7:24 pm
Should the President declare a Civil Emergency until truth in be determined. Truth of birth and true interest in the County President Elect represents. His youthful learning was in Muslim schools who believe their God wants the to die for the sake of their religious beliefs. Truth is in the best interest of our entire Country. Even those suffering through hardships and wanted to hear what they were told that would save them from more hardships. Evidence shows he was not born in the United States and the he was adopted in another Country where his United States Citizenship ended.
December 11th, 2008 at 7:38 pm
The Electoral College is only in charge of certificating that the votes are correct according to the law. They are not in charge of confirming the natural birth of the President Elect. I believe I read this in the Amendments. Is this why the United States Supreme Court turned down the hearing? If they turned down the hearing because it was not in the interest of the majority of the population in that Obama won the majority votes, that is also wrong because where there is evidence that one lied to this entire Country to gain votes is in the best interest of the majority of the population. I have lost respect for the Justice System in this Country. It is sad and very depressing. Go to this link for something that one can do at this point…Newsmax.com They have a letter and a hyperlink to send 50 faxes to every Attorny General of every state.