Comments on: Supreme Court Denies Request for Injunctive Relief in One Eligibility Case http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/12/08/us-supreme-court-denies-requests-for-injunctive-relief-in-two-obama-eligibility-cases/ Sun, 12 Feb 2012 13:28:23 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3879 By: Dee http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/12/08/us-supreme-court-denies-requests-for-injunctive-relief-in-two-obama-eligibility-cases/comment-page-1/#comment-590388 Dee Fri, 12 Dec 2008 03:38:03 +0000 http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4411#comment-590388 The Electoral College is only in charge of certificating that the votes are correct according to the law. They are not in charge of confirming the natural birth of the President Elect. I believe I read this in the Amendments. Is this why the United States Supreme Court turned down the hearing? If they turned down the hearing because it was not in the interest of the majority of the population in that Obama won the majority votes, that is also wrong because where there is evidence that one lied to this entire Country to gain votes is in the best interest of the majority of the population. I have lost respect for the Justice System in this Country. It is sad and very depressing. Go to this link for something that one can do at this point...Newsmax.com They have a letter and a hyperlink to send 50 faxes to every Attorny General of every state. The Electoral College is only in charge of certificating that the votes are correct according to the law. They are not in charge of confirming the natural birth of the President Elect. I believe I read this in the Amendments. Is this why the United States Supreme Court turned down the hearing? If they turned down the hearing because it was not in the interest of the majority of the population in that Obama won the majority votes, that is also wrong because where there is evidence that one lied to this entire Country to gain votes is in the best interest of the majority of the population. I have lost respect for the Justice System in this Country. It is sad and very depressing. Go to this link for something that one can do at this point…Newsmax.com They have a letter and a hyperlink to send 50 faxes to every Attorny General of every state.

]]> By: Dee http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/12/08/us-supreme-court-denies-requests-for-injunctive-relief-in-two-obama-eligibility-cases/comment-page-1/#comment-589231 Dee Thu, 11 Dec 2008 03:24:57 +0000 http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4411#comment-589231 Should the President declare a Civil Emergency until truth in be determined. Truth of birth and true interest in the County President Elect represents. His youthful learning was in Muslim schools who believe their God wants the to die for the sake of their religious beliefs. Truth is in the best interest of our entire Country. Even those suffering through hardships and wanted to hear what they were told that would save them from more hardships. Evidence shows he was not born in the United States and the he was adopted in another Country where his United States Citizenship ended. Should the President declare a Civil Emergency until truth in be determined. Truth of birth and true interest in the County President Elect represents. His youthful learning was in Muslim schools who believe their God wants the to die for the sake of their religious beliefs. Truth is in the best interest of our entire Country. Even those suffering through hardships and wanted to hear what they were told that would save them from more hardships. Evidence shows he was not born in the United States and the he was adopted in another Country where his United States Citizenship ended.

]]> By: Deb http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/12/08/us-supreme-court-denies-requests-for-injunctive-relief-in-two-obama-eligibility-cases/comment-page-1/#comment-588446 Deb Wed, 10 Dec 2008 00:19:09 +0000 http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4411#comment-588446 Sould President Bush quickly request an Amendment be written that President Elect of the United States must show proof of his/her natural born citizenship before taking office. Sould President Bush quickly request an Amendment be written that President Elect of the United States must show proof of his/her natural born citizenship before taking office.

]]> By: ETJB http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/12/08/us-supreme-court-denies-requests-for-injunctive-relief-in-two-obama-eligibility-cases/comment-page-1/#comment-588373 ETJB Tue, 09 Dec 2008 18:45:18 +0000 http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4411#comment-588373 Q) Is Barack Obama a citizen of the United States? A) Yes. Q) Is Barack Obama a natural born citizen of the United States? A) Yes. I have a lots of complaints about the Supreme Court when it comes to electoral issues. But, all these lawsuits have just been incredibly silly, stupid and downright embarassing to watch unfold. Q) Is Barack Obama a citizen of the United States?

A) Yes.

Q) Is Barack Obama a natural born citizen of the United States?

A) Yes.

I have a lots of complaints about the Supreme Court when it comes to electoral issues. But, all these lawsuits have just been incredibly silly, stupid and downright embarassing to watch unfold.

]]> By: D. Frank Robinson http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/12/08/us-supreme-court-denies-requests-for-injunctive-relief-in-two-obama-eligibility-cases/comment-page-1/#comment-587927 D. Frank Robinson Mon, 08 Dec 2008 20:26:07 +0000 http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4411#comment-587927 It's the Congress! If the Congress will not clear up the issue of Mr. Obama's eligibility, then what are your chances of voting them out in 2010? Not really that good unless you have 435 alternative candidates (Independents or other parties). But what are your chances of that? Not really that good either because the self-entrenched federalist aristocrats have control of ballot access. Do you see a pattern here since the early 20th Century? Suppress the people's influence by freezing the size of the U.S. House and then monopolizing access to those seats with ballot access restrictions, gerrymandered "safe" seats and campaign finance censorship. Add in corporate control of the mainstream media and you have the people tied down like Gulliver. It’s the Congress! If the Congress will not clear up the issue of Mr. Obama’s eligibility, then what are your chances of voting them out in 2010? Not really that good unless you have 435 alternative candidates (Independents or other parties). But what are your chances of that? Not really that good either because the self-entrenched federalist aristocrats have control of ballot access. Do you see a pattern here since the early 20th Century? Suppress the people’s influence by freezing the size of the U.S. House and then monopolizing access to those seats with ballot access restrictions, gerrymandered “safe” seats and campaign finance censorship. Add in corporate control of the mainstream media and you have the people tied down like Gulliver.

]]> By: billvanallen http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/12/08/us-supreme-court-denies-requests-for-injunctive-relief-in-two-obama-eligibility-cases/comment-page-1/#comment-587918 billvanallen Mon, 08 Dec 2008 20:07:15 +0000 http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4411#comment-587918 No. 08A469 Title: Cort Wrotnowski, Applicant v. Susan Bysiewicz, Connecticut Secretary of State Docketed: Lower Ct: Supreme Court of Connecticut Case Nos.: (SC 18264) ~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Nov 25 2008 Application (08A469) for stay and/or injunction, submitted to Justice Ginsburg. Nov 26 2008 Application (08A469) denied by Justice Ginsburg. Nov 29 2008 Application (08A469) refiled and submitted to Justice Scalia. Dec 8 2008 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 12, 2008. Dec 8 2008 Application (08A469) referred to the Court by Justice Scalia. ________________________________________ ~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~Phone~~~ Attorneys for Petitioner: Cort Wrotnowski 1057 North Street (202) 862-8554 Greenwich, CT 06831 Party name: Cort Wrotnowski Attorneys for Respondent: Richard Blumenthal Attorney General (860) 808-5316 Office of the Attorney General 55 Elm Street P.O. Box 120 Hartford, CT 06141-0120 Party name: Susan Bysiewicz, Connecticut Secretary of State No. 08A469
Title: Cort Wrotnowski, Applicant
v.
Susan Bysiewicz, Connecticut Secretary of State

Docketed:
Lower Ct: Supreme Court of Connecticut
Case Nos.: (SC 18264)

~~~Date~~~ ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Nov 25 2008 Application (08A469) for stay and/or injunction, submitted to Justice Ginsburg.
Nov 26 2008 Application (08A469) denied by Justice Ginsburg.
Nov 29 2008 Application (08A469) refiled and submitted to Justice Scalia.
Dec 8 2008 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 12, 2008.
Dec 8 2008 Application (08A469) referred to the Court by Justice Scalia.

________________________________________

~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~Phone~~~
Attorneys for Petitioner:
Cort Wrotnowski 1057 North Street (202) 862-8554
Greenwich, CT 06831
Party name: Cort Wrotnowski
Attorneys for Respondent:
Richard Blumenthal Attorney General (860) 808-5316
Office of the Attorney General
55 Elm Street
P.O. Box 120
Hartford, CT 06141-0120
Party name: Susan Bysiewicz, Connecticut Secretary of State

]]> By: billvanallen http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/12/08/us-supreme-court-denies-requests-for-injunctive-relief-in-two-obama-eligibility-cases/comment-page-1/#comment-587765 billvanallen Mon, 08 Dec 2008 17:07:13 +0000 http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4411#comment-587765 just one Obama related order (today) -- the NJ case, I don't believe the CT case was on the order list and the PA, CA, and NY (and TX??) cases have not been given conference dates yet -- perhaps they will be all rolled into this coming Friday (Dec 12th) conference -- the last of the year and last before the Dec 15 Electoral College date just one Obama related order (today) — the NJ case, I don’t believe the CT case was on the order list and the PA, CA, and NY (and TX??) cases have not been given conference dates yet — perhaps they will be all rolled into this coming Friday (Dec 12th) conference — the last of the year and last before the Dec 15 Electoral College date

]]> By: billie http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/12/08/us-supreme-court-denies-requests-for-injunctive-relief-in-two-obama-eligibility-cases/comment-page-1/#comment-587740 billie Mon, 08 Dec 2008 16:45:17 +0000 http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4411#comment-587740 You right-wingers are so right. I'd much rather have the laws and Presidents of this country decided by some tax-evading shyster as opposed to the Supreme Court. Because, as we all know, laywers are the most honest and decent people around, they never have any exterior motives, and they truly want what is best for humanity. Yes, I think I'll rely on these people to tell me what's what, and let me know exactly how the world works, who I can point the finger at, and most importantly, how I can avoid paying my taxes. Something every good citizen should know. I can alos feel encouraged to talk about the Constitution, a document I have never read or looked at, as opposed to my new President Barack Obama who has a degree in Constitutional law. You right-wingers are so right. I’d much rather have the laws and Presidents of this country decided by some tax-evading shyster as opposed to the Supreme Court. Because, as we all know, laywers are the most honest and decent people around, they never have any exterior motives, and they truly want what is best for humanity. Yes, I think I’ll rely on these people to tell me what’s what, and let me know exactly how the world works, who I can point the finger at, and most importantly, how I can avoid paying my taxes. Something every good citizen should know. I can alos feel encouraged to talk about the Constitution, a document I have never read or looked at, as opposed to my new President Barack Obama who has a degree in Constitutional law.

]]> By: Mr. Reality http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/12/08/us-supreme-court-denies-requests-for-injunctive-relief-in-two-obama-eligibility-cases/comment-page-1/#comment-587739 Mr. Reality Mon, 08 Dec 2008 16:44:18 +0000 http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4411#comment-587739 It was NOT against the law for Americans to travel to Pakistan, in 1981, nor is it now. The State Department ADVISED against it, because Pakistan was a dangerous place then, as it can be today. Anyone was free to ignore those warnings. As for banning travel to Cuba, how can those who supposedly support Constitutional freedoms tolerate the government dictating where private citizens can travel? Citizens of Canada, germany, france, the UK, etc. can all visit Cuba, yet Americans can't? Besides, the embargo has been very successful, right? After all Castro is still there, 35 years later. It was NOT against the law for Americans to travel to Pakistan, in 1981, nor is it now. The State Department ADVISED against it, because Pakistan was a dangerous place then, as it can be today. Anyone was free to ignore those warnings.

As for banning travel to Cuba, how can those who supposedly support Constitutional freedoms tolerate the government dictating where private citizens can travel? Citizens of Canada, germany, france, the UK, etc. can all visit Cuba, yet Americans can’t? Besides, the embargo has been very successful, right? After all Castro is still there, 35 years later.

]]> By: junglejim123 http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/12/08/us-supreme-court-denies-requests-for-injunctive-relief-in-two-obama-eligibility-cases/comment-page-1/#comment-587724 junglejim123 Mon, 08 Dec 2008 16:16:01 +0000 http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4411#comment-587724 What a joke. They can hand the Presidency to Bushie and they can rule that your house can be taken by your town if they want your land but they refuse to look into anything involving Obama. I guess we can all demand that our college and medical records are sealed and we can travel anywhere even if its against the laws for US citizens. Now we can travel to Cuba although its against our laws just like Obama traveled to Pakistan in 1981. Great job of subverting our Constitution !!! What a joke. They can hand the Presidency to Bushie and they can rule that your house can be taken by your town if they want your land but they refuse to look into anything involving Obama. I guess we can all demand that our college and medical records are sealed and we can travel anywhere even if its against the laws for US citizens. Now we can travel to Cuba although its against our laws just like Obama traveled to Pakistan in 1981. Great job of subverting our Constitution !!!

]]>