<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Minor Party and Independent Candidate Vote for U.S. House in 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/12/09/minor-party-and-independent-candidate-vote-for-us-house-in-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/12/09/minor-party-and-independent-candidate-vote-for-us-house-in-2008/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 11:51:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3357</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Demo Rep</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/12/09/minor-party-and-independent-candidate-vote-for-us-house-in-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-588542</link>
		<dc:creator>Demo Rep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 05:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4419#comment-588542</guid>
		<description>Lots and lots of NON-votes due to NO D or NO R or NO third party / independent candidates in many of the 435 gerrymander districts.

Same for many State legislatures.

i.e. Gerrymander minority rule math in ALL of the above -- about half the votes in half the gerrymander areas = about 25-30 percent indirect minority rule in ALL of the above.  Much worse due to primary math.

REAL Democracy NOW

Total Votes / Total Seats = EQUAL votes needed for each seat winner.

NO primaries are needed.  Ballot access via equal nominating petitions.

P.R. in various *civilized* *modern* nations -- Israel, Germany, New Zealand, etc. with multiple parties winning seats.

The U.S.A. continues in the gerrymander DARK AGES -- and it shows -- the pending bankruptcy of the U.S.A. and State regimes due to accumulated deficits in the $$$ Trillions and irrational unfunded liabilities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lots and lots of NON-votes due to NO D or NO R or NO third party / independent candidates in many of the 435 gerrymander districts.</p>
<p>Same for many State legislatures.</p>
<p>i.e. Gerrymander minority rule math in ALL of the above &#8212; about half the votes in half the gerrymander areas = about 25-30 percent indirect minority rule in ALL of the above.  Much worse due to primary math.</p>
<p>REAL Democracy NOW</p>
<p>Total Votes / Total Seats = EQUAL votes needed for each seat winner.</p>
<p>NO primaries are needed.  Ballot access via equal nominating petitions.</p>
<p>P.R. in various *civilized* *modern* nations &#8212; Israel, Germany, New Zealand, etc. with multiple parties winning seats.</p>
<p>The U.S.A. continues in the gerrymander DARK AGES &#8212; and it shows &#8212; the pending bankruptcy of the U.S.A. and State regimes due to accumulated deficits in the $$$ Trillions and irrational unfunded liabilities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross Levin</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/12/09/minor-party-and-independent-candidate-vote-for-us-house-in-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-588485</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross Levin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 02:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4419#comment-588485</guid>
		<description>You can&#039;t blame it all on ballot access.  Republicans and Democrats weren&#039;t in every race, either.  And given these numbers, even if every nationally organized party was on every ballot, the minors would still get low single digit percentages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can&#8217;t blame it all on ballot access.  Republicans and Democrats weren&#8217;t in every race, either.  And given these numbers, even if every nationally organized party was on every ballot, the minors would still get low single digit percentages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/12/09/minor-party-and-independent-candidate-vote-for-us-house-in-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-588372</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 18:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4419#comment-588372</guid>
		<description>The &quot;other&quot; percentages are artificially lower because there are no &quot;other&quot; candidates on the ballot for US House in so many districts.  If we had tolerant ballot access in every state, the &quot;other&quot; percentage would be much higher.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;other&#8221; percentages are artificially lower because there are no &#8220;other&#8221; candidates on the ballot for US House in so many districts.  If we had tolerant ballot access in every state, the &#8220;other&#8221; percentage would be much higher.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ETJB</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/12/09/minor-party-and-independent-candidate-vote-for-us-house-in-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-588369</link>
		<dc:creator>ETJB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 18:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4419#comment-588369</guid>
		<description>Interesting.  Looking at these numbers, I do sometimes wonmder if adopting some form of PR would make that much difference in the US.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.  Looking at these numbers, I do sometimes wonmder if adopting some form of PR would make that much difference in the US.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

