Comments on: Indiana Activists Need Quick Action http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/12/22/indiana-activists-need-quick-action/ Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:09:27 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=5417 By: Danny S http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/12/22/indiana-activists-need-quick-action/comment-page-1/#comment-602590 Danny S Tue, 23 Dec 2008 00:34:53 +0000 http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4538#comment-602590 I think you reported earlier Richard that Texas does have a piece of legislation up that was sponsored by two representatives I believe, just to note. I think you reported earlier Richard that Texas does have a piece of legislation up that was sponsored by two representatives I believe, just to note.

]]> By: Demo Rep http://www.ballot-access.org/2008/12/22/indiana-activists-need-quick-action/comment-page-1/#comment-602555 Demo Rep Mon, 22 Dec 2008 21:46:32 +0000 http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4538#comment-602555 Separate is NOT equal in ALL States ALL the time. Brown v. Bd of Ed 1954 -- NOT brought up by armies of MORON lawyers since 1968 in hundreds of ballot access cases. Obvious remedy - EQUAL nominating petitions for ALL candidates for the same office in the same election area. Way too difficult for the party hack Supremes to understand ??? NO primary elections are needed. P.R. legislative and A.V. - nonpartisan executive / judicial Separate is NOT equal in ALL States ALL the time.

Brown v. Bd of Ed 1954 — NOT brought up by armies of MORON lawyers since 1968 in hundreds of ballot access cases.

Obvious remedy – EQUAL nominating petitions for ALL candidates for the same office in the same election area.

Way too difficult for the party hack Supremes to understand ???

NO primary elections are needed.

P.R. legislative and A.V. – nonpartisan executive / judicial

]]>