Comments on: U.S. Supreme Court Refuses One of Phil Berg’s Cases http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/01/12/us-supreme-court-refuses-one-of-phil-bergs-cases/ Sun, 12 Feb 2012 09:34:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=1964 By: richCares http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/01/12/us-supreme-court-refuses-one-of-phil-bergs-cases/comment-page-3/#comment-644079 richCares Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:51:19 +0000 http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4728#comment-644079 "...saga contines" only in the mind of a Birther, you know the ones that constantly lose suits and can't get most people to believe them. Berg case denied and today Lightfot/Orly case denied, so keep it up, you people enjoy losing so much, it's a nice laugh for us! “…saga contines”
only in the mind of a Birther, you know the ones that constantly lose suits and can’t get most people to believe them.
Berg case denied and today Lightfot/Orly case denied, so keep it up, you people enjoy losing so much, it’s a nice laugh for us!

]]> By: vma224 http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/01/12/us-supreme-court-refuses-one-of-phil-bergs-cases/comment-page-3/#comment-644074 vma224 Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:47:10 +0000 http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4728#comment-644074 World Net Daily (WND) is in the foregroud of anti-Obama articles, they have an anti-Obam article evry day, this is a Christian web site, but something interesting about these Christians they prayed for Obama not to get nominated OBAMA NOMINATED they prayed for Obama's nominatin be rained out! NO RAIN they prayed for Obama to lose OBAMA WON now they pray for Obama to fail GUESS OUTCOME it appears that God is on Obama's side as he rejects these prayers or maybe God don't like Christians! World Net Daily (WND) is in the foregroud of anti-Obama articles, they have an anti-Obam article evry day, this is a Christian web site, but something interesting about these Christians

they prayed for Obama not to get nominated
OBAMA NOMINATED

they prayed for Obama’s nominatin be rained out!
NO RAIN

they prayed for Obama to lose
OBAMA WON

now they pray for Obama to fail
GUESS OUTCOME

it appears that God is on Obama’s side as he rejects these prayers or maybe God don’t like Christians!

]]> By: What's the big deal http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/01/12/us-supreme-court-refuses-one-of-phil-bergs-cases/comment-page-3/#comment-641925 What's the big deal Sat, 24 Jan 2009 15:09:22 +0000 http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4728#comment-641925 For those that insist that "all Obama has to do is provide a valid birth certificate", um he's done that but you idiots are not satisfied with what he provided (which was what was given to him by the Hawaian government and last I checked Hawaii IS a state in this union). But here's the deal...Obama doesn't have to "prove" anything...Berg does because he is the Plaintiff. If Berg can't make his prima facia case then he has no case, period. This is why his initial case in Philly got tossed. These are his appeals from that initial case. He wasn't able to prove his case then and he's not going to be able to prove it now. This man needs to have his law license yanked. He's a nobody and any time he doesn't agree with something, he files suit. He's wasting tax payers money. Courts have other things to decide and this crap isn't one of them. For those that insist that “all Obama has to do is provide a valid birth certificate”, um he’s done that but you idiots are not satisfied with what he provided (which was what was given to him by the Hawaian government and last I checked Hawaii IS a state in this union).

But here’s the deal…Obama doesn’t have to “prove” anything…Berg does because he is the Plaintiff. If Berg can’t make his prima facia case then he has no case, period.

This is why his initial case in Philly got tossed. These are his appeals from that initial case. He wasn’t able to prove his case then and he’s not going to be able to prove it now.

This man needs to have his law license yanked. He’s a nobody and any time he doesn’t agree with something, he files suit. He’s wasting tax payers money. Courts have other things to decide and this crap isn’t one of them.

]]> By: Glen http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/01/12/us-supreme-court-refuses-one-of-phil-bergs-cases/comment-page-3/#comment-641582 Glen Sat, 24 Jan 2009 06:53:34 +0000 http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4728#comment-641582 "A child born abroad out-of-wedlock to a U.S. citizen mother may acquire U.S. citizenship if the mother was a U.S. citizen at the time of the child’s birth, and if the mother had previously been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year." Ok, so can it be proven she was physically present in a US possession for 1 year prior to the birth? Where are her passport records? Time for subpoenas! There is still the issue of his Indonesian citizenship and passport records...since when can a President of the USA be a dual citizen? the saga continues. “A child born abroad out-of-wedlock to a U.S. citizen mother may acquire U.S. citizenship if the mother was a U.S. citizen at the time of the child’s birth, and if the mother had previously been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year.”

Ok, so can it be proven she was physically present in a US possession for 1 year prior to the birth? Where are her passport records? Time for subpoenas!

There is still the issue of his Indonesian citizenship and passport records…since when can a President of the USA be a dual citizen? the saga continues.

]]> By: vb1175 http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/01/12/us-supreme-court-refuses-one-of-phil-bergs-cases/comment-page-3/#comment-641241 vb1175 Fri, 23 Jan 2009 18:00:56 +0000 http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4728#comment-641241 Oh, and Glen, if you look up what "Section 301(g)INA" is the provision of the Immigration & Nationality Act that covers all laws defining Nationals and Citizens of the United States at Birth. There's only two types of citizens in the US Code - Natural Born or Naturalized - and this is one way to be natural born. Section 301 states: The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth: And the subsection that applies is subsection (g): A child born abroad out-of-wedlock to a U.S. citizen mother may acquire U.S. citizenship if the mother was a U.S. citizen at the time of the child’s birth, and if the mother had previously been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year. Not that it matters. He was born in Hawaii, he was inaugurated, he is the President, and he will be for at least 4 years. Oh, and Glen, if you look up what “Section 301(g)INA” is the provision of the Immigration & Nationality Act
that covers all laws defining Nationals and Citizens of the United States at Birth. There’s only two types of citizens in the US Code – Natural Born or Naturalized – and this is one way to be natural born.

Section 301 states:

The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth:

And the subsection that applies is subsection (g):

A child born abroad out-of-wedlock to a U.S. citizen mother may acquire U.S. citizenship if the mother was a U.S. citizen at the time of the child’s birth, and if the mother had previously been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year.

Not that it matters. He was born in Hawaii, he was inaugurated, he is the President, and he will be for at least 4 years.

]]> By: vb1175 http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/01/12/us-supreme-court-refuses-one-of-phil-bergs-cases/comment-page-2/#comment-641237 vb1175 Fri, 23 Jan 2009 17:42:24 +0000 http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4728#comment-641237 Hey Glen, can you say the Right Wing equivalent of the 911 Truthers? Go see a psychiatrist and get some Haldol. It should help with the delusions. 'Tis over. Hey Glen, can you say the Right Wing equivalent of the 911 Truthers? Go see a psychiatrist and get some Haldol. It should help with the delusions. ‘Tis over.

]]> By: Glen http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/01/12/us-supreme-court-refuses-one-of-phil-bergs-cases/comment-page-2/#comment-640182 Glen Thu, 22 Jan 2009 07:24:41 +0000 http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4728#comment-640182 can someone say... "expanded US Interstate Highway Project and Volcano Preservation funding" at the sum of probably $20 Billion as laundered paoli to the Island for services rendered, must be nice to have friends in high places... LOL can someone say… “expanded US Interstate Highway Project and Volcano Preservation funding” at the sum of probably $20 Billion as laundered paoli to the Island for services rendered, must be nice to have friends in high places… LOL

]]> By: Glen http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/01/12/us-supreme-court-refuses-one-of-phil-bergs-cases/comment-page-2/#comment-640181 Glen Thu, 22 Jan 2009 07:20:37 +0000 http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4728#comment-640181 I bet Hawaii gets a whole lot of extra funding for "projects" as a thank you gift for keeping his personal records sealed or "corrected" I bet Hawaii gets a whole lot of extra funding for “projects” as a thank you gift for keeping his personal records sealed or “corrected”

]]> By: Glen http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/01/12/us-supreme-court-refuses-one-of-phil-bergs-cases/comment-page-2/#comment-640179 Glen Thu, 22 Jan 2009 07:17:59 +0000 http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4728#comment-640179 It may be a short lived victory if the Supreme Court does there job.. anyway, how is it that Obama was able to have a private fire place lunch with members of the SCOTUS when they were in the middle of hearing cases before them concerning his eligibility? this sounds like a conflict of interest and ethics violations at the very least? It may be a short lived victory if the Supreme Court does there job.. anyway, how is it that Obama was able to have a private fire place lunch with members of the SCOTUS when they were in the middle of hearing cases before them concerning his eligibility? this sounds like a conflict of interest and ethics violations at the very least?

]]> By: GetOverYourselves http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/01/12/us-supreme-court-refuses-one-of-phil-bergs-cases/comment-page-2/#comment-639528 GetOverYourselves Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:02:32 +0000 http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4728#comment-639528 Let me amend the above. He DID run, DID win and WAS inaugurated. Now the real hard work begins. We could all stand with a bit of success right now. Let me amend the above. He DID run, DID win and WAS inaugurated. Now the real hard work begins. We could all stand with a bit of success right now.

]]>