<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kentucky Bill to Let Independent Voters Vote in Partisan Primaries</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/01/19/kentucky-bill-to-let-independent-voters-vote-in-partisan-primaries/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/01/19/kentucky-bill-to-let-independent-voters-vote-in-partisan-primaries/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 09:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4662</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Hosse</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/01/19/kentucky-bill-to-let-independent-voters-vote-in-partisan-primaries/comment-page-1/#comment-668802</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Hosse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 03:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4830#comment-668802</guid>
		<description>Rep Gerald Neal (D) is also a co-sponser of this legislation. Independents here in Kentucky should, in my opinion, be allowed to partisipate in Primaries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rep Gerald Neal (D) is also a co-sponser of this legislation. Independents here in Kentucky should, in my opinion, be allowed to partisipate in Primaries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Rankin</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/01/19/kentucky-bill-to-let-independent-voters-vote-in-partisan-primaries/comment-page-1/#comment-639568</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Rankin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 19:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4830#comment-639568</guid>
		<description>To my knowledge, Arizona&#039;s Democrats and Republicans are the only parties that are letting state law intimidate them into allowing independents into their primaries.  AZ&#039;s Libertarians won a federal suit in 2007 that lets them block independents from their primaries.

Under a state attorney general&#039;s opinion, Nebraska gives independents their choice of primary in congressional elections.  This is because independents are able to vote in the &quot;nonpartisan primary&quot; for the state legislature, which, of course, is elected on a nonpartisan basis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To my knowledge, Arizona&#8217;s Democrats and Republicans are the only parties that are letting state law intimidate them into allowing independents into their primaries.  AZ&#8217;s Libertarians won a federal suit in 2007 that lets them block independents from their primaries.</p>
<p>Under a state attorney general&#8217;s opinion, Nebraska gives independents their choice of primary in congressional elections.  This is because independents are able to vote in the &#8220;nonpartisan primary&#8221; for the state legislature, which, of course, is elected on a nonpartisan basis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

