<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oklahoma Won&#8217;t Ask for U.S. Supreme Court Review in Out-of-State Circulators Case</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/01/22/oklahoma-wont-ask-for-us-supreme-court-review-in-out-of-state-circulators-case/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/01/22/oklahoma-wont-ask-for-us-supreme-court-review-in-out-of-state-circulators-case/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 14:15:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3330</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Rankin</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/01/22/oklahoma-wont-ask-for-us-supreme-court-review-in-out-of-state-circulators-case/comment-page-1/#comment-641433</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Rankin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 00:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4876#comment-641433</guid>
		<description>I thought the Supreme Court had agreed to hear Brewer v. Nader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the Supreme Court had agreed to hear Brewer v. Nader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/01/22/oklahoma-wont-ask-for-us-supreme-court-review-in-out-of-state-circulators-case/comment-page-1/#comment-641315</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4876#comment-641315</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think Oklahoma officials follow the Pennsylvania way of thinking.  Anyway, this issue won&#039;t really be settled until we see whether the US Supreme Court hears the Nader Arizona case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think Oklahoma officials follow the Pennsylvania way of thinking.  Anyway, this issue won&#8217;t really be settled until we see whether the US Supreme Court hears the Nader Arizona case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom McLaughlin</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/01/22/oklahoma-wont-ask-for-us-supreme-court-review-in-out-of-state-circulators-case/comment-page-1/#comment-641215</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom McLaughlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 17:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4876#comment-641215</guid>
		<description>By not going to the Supreme Court (and losing there), is Oklahoma following the Pennsylvania&#039;s practice? PA Commonwealth Court says it is not bound by lower federal court rulings, only US Supreme Court rulings.  For that reason, when Pennsylvania loses in Federal court and thinks it may not win in the US Supreme Court, it does not appeal.  By not appealing (and losing) in the US Supreme Court, Oklahoma avoids a ruling which will impact all the other states.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By not going to the Supreme Court (and losing there), is Oklahoma following the Pennsylvania&#8217;s practice? PA Commonwealth Court says it is not bound by lower federal court rulings, only US Supreme Court rulings.  For that reason, when Pennsylvania loses in Federal court and thinks it may not win in the US Supreme Court, it does not appeal.  By not appealing (and losing) in the US Supreme Court, Oklahoma avoids a ruling which will impact all the other states.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M Carling</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/01/22/oklahoma-wont-ask-for-us-supreme-court-review-in-out-of-state-circulators-case/comment-page-1/#comment-641193</link>
		<dc:creator>M Carling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 17:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=4876#comment-641193</guid>
		<description>Congratulations to Paul, Susan, and Rick!  They are heroes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations to Paul, Susan, and Rick!  They are heroes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

