<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vermont Bill for Instant Runoff in Gubernatorial Elections</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/03/08/vermont-bill-for-instant-runoff-in-gubernatorial-elections/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/03/08/vermont-bill-for-instant-runoff-in-gubernatorial-elections/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 11:51:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1943</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Riley</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/03/08/vermont-bill-for-instant-runoff-in-gubernatorial-elections/comment-page-1/#comment-678754</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Riley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 00:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=5525#comment-678754</guid>
		<description>It is interesting that participation varied so much among the various wards.  3 individual wards had more votes cast than the combined total from the 2 low participation wards.  The low participation wards also had high rates of votes going exhausted.

Is there something intrinsic to an IRV election that prevents Burlington from reporting the results for city councilor elections held at the same time (using FPTP)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is interesting that participation varied so much among the various wards.  3 individual wards had more votes cast than the combined total from the 2 low participation wards.  The low participation wards also had high rates of votes going exhausted.</p>
<p>Is there something intrinsic to an IRV election that prevents Burlington from reporting the results for city councilor elections held at the same time (using FPTP)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Richie</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/03/08/vermont-bill-for-instant-runoff-in-gubernatorial-elections/comment-page-1/#comment-677817</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Richie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=5525#comment-677817</guid>
		<description>Burlington had a remarkable IRV election for mayor earlier this month that has boosted the case for instant runoff voting in the state. Voters handled the system extremely well with virtiually no additioanl voter education -- just a good ballot design and clear instructions. Of nearly 9,000 ballots in the mayoral race, only one was invalid -- 99.99% validity. There were five candidates, and the Progressive Party incumbent was re-elected after trailing a Republican state legislator in first choice rankings. See www.burlingtonvotes.org or more</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Burlington had a remarkable IRV election for mayor earlier this month that has boosted the case for instant runoff voting in the state. Voters handled the system extremely well with virtiually no additioanl voter education &#8212; just a good ballot design and clear instructions. Of nearly 9,000 ballots in the mayoral race, only one was invalid &#8212; 99.99% validity. There were five candidates, and the Progressive Party incumbent was re-elected after trailing a Republican state legislator in first choice rankings. See <a href="http://www.burlingtonvotes.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.burlingtonvotes.org</a> or more</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

