<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Aspen City Council Implements Ranked Choice Voting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/03/11/aspen-city-council-implements-ranked-choice-voting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/03/11/aspen-city-council-implements-ranked-choice-voting/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 05:30:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4033</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Richie</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/03/11/aspen-city-council-implements-ranked-choice-voting/comment-page-1/#comment-677810</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Richie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=5553#comment-677810</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s an interesting situation there. &quot;Classic&quot; instant runoff voting is being used for mayor, but for the two-seat races for city council, Aspen came up with an novel system that remains like the previous majoritarian system, but creatively uses key elements of instant runoff voting to generate two seats. FairVote would always prefer the choice method of proportional representation in such mulit-seat elections, but believe the Aspen system is a sensible way to elect two seats with a majoritarian ranked choice system. More analysis soon at www.fairvote.org/irv</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s an interesting situation there. &#8220;Classic&#8221; instant runoff voting is being used for mayor, but for the two-seat races for city council, Aspen came up with an novel system that remains like the previous majoritarian system, but creatively uses key elements of instant runoff voting to generate two seats. FairVote would always prefer the choice method of proportional representation in such mulit-seat elections, but believe the Aspen system is a sensible way to elect two seats with a majoritarian ranked choice system. More analysis soon at <a href="http://www.fairvote.org/irv" rel="nofollow">http://www.fairvote.org/irv</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enrique</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/03/11/aspen-city-council-implements-ranked-choice-voting/comment-page-1/#comment-677342</link>
		<dc:creator>Enrique</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 20:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=5553#comment-677342</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this great information. Hopefully we&#039;ll have this someday in NM too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this great information. Hopefully we&#8217;ll have this someday in NM too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard G.</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/03/11/aspen-city-council-implements-ranked-choice-voting/comment-page-1/#comment-677212</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=5553#comment-677212</guid>
		<description>Now that I can support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that I can support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

