Comments on: One More Case on Presidential Qualifications is Now Reported

By: Richard

Richard — Sat, 14 Mar 2009 04:18:33 +0000

Jenness v Brown wasn’t given a 3-judge panel, even though it was filed before July 1, 1976. It was decided by a single US District Court Judge, Joseph Kinneary. It was case no. civil 72-204 in the southern district of Ohio, decision of Sep. 27, 1972. It is only 4 pages long.

By: Jack Di Sarno

Jack Di Sarno — Sat, 14 Mar 2009 01:31:47 +0000

You seem to be saying that the case reporting system in the U.S. is hit or miss. For many decades all federal courts and virtually all state courts have contracted with private reporters (publishers) or have employed their own in house reporters. Of course, there is a time lag between the announcement & release of the decision and the editing, printing & binding of the reports. During this initial period of about one to three months,anybody can order the unbound “slip” decision for a modest fee. Finally, if this was one of the rare cases before a panel of three district court judges the report may be harder to find. This is not to be confused with the standard 3 judge appellate court panels.

By: JakeD

JakeD — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 22:46:39 +0000

Richard:

I certainly HOPE you are not suggesting that “open” ballot access requires candidates who are LEGALLY UNQUALIFIED to be placed on the ballot anyway …

By: JakeD

JakeD — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 22:29:14 +0000

It’s about time that the States re-assert their power over the LIMITED federal government.

By: richard

richard — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 21:38:03 +0000

Thank you.

By: Bob

Bob — Fri, 13 Mar 2009 21:00:54 +0000

567 F.Supp.2d 1144 (not 114)