<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: James Tedisco Concedes in New York&#8217;s US House Race, 20th District</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/04/24/james-tedisco-concedes-in-new-yorks-us-house-race-20th-district/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/04/24/james-tedisco-concedes-in-new-yorks-us-house-race-20th-district/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 11:51:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=9133</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: billvanallen</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/04/24/james-tedisco-concedes-in-new-yorks-us-house-race-20th-district/comment-page-1/#comment-704838</link>
		<dc:creator>billvanallen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 21:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=5984#comment-704838</guid>
		<description>-- and that is what LPNY got for not contesting their petition / ballot access challenge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8211; and that is what LPNY got for not contesting their petition / ballot access challenge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PTK</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/04/24/james-tedisco-concedes-in-new-yorks-us-house-race-20th-district/comment-page-1/#comment-704834</link>
		<dc:creator>PTK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 21:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=5984#comment-704834</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s what Tedisco gets for getting Sundwall off the ballot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s what Tedisco gets for getting Sundwall off the ballot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/04/24/james-tedisco-concedes-in-new-yorks-us-house-race-20th-district/comment-page-1/#comment-704824</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 21:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=5984#comment-704824</guid>
		<description>New York probably will never say how many votes Eric Sundwall received.  Pennsylvania also didn&#039;t count the 2006 ballots that had the Green Party US Senate candidates&#039;s name on them (Carl Romanelli).  It was the same situation; the early absentee votes had Romanelli&#039;s name on them but the state kept that information to itself.  That&#039;s why the recent lawsuit filed in federal court in Pennsylvania, complaining about Pennsylvania&#039;s failure to count and canvass write-ins, is so important.  Write-ins aren&#039;t exactly the same as ballots with a candidate&#039;s name on them, but the principle is the same.  All voters must be treated equally.  All voters who cast a valid vote have a right to have their votes tallied.  The U.S. Supreme Court said this almost 100 years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New York probably will never say how many votes Eric Sundwall received.  Pennsylvania also didn&#8217;t count the 2006 ballots that had the Green Party US Senate candidates&#8217;s name on them (Carl Romanelli).  It was the same situation; the early absentee votes had Romanelli&#8217;s name on them but the state kept that information to itself.  That&#8217;s why the recent lawsuit filed in federal court in Pennsylvania, complaining about Pennsylvania&#8217;s failure to count and canvass write-ins, is so important.  Write-ins aren&#8217;t exactly the same as ballots with a candidate&#8217;s name on them, but the principle is the same.  All voters must be treated equally.  All voters who cast a valid vote have a right to have their votes tallied.  The U.S. Supreme Court said this almost 100 years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/04/24/james-tedisco-concedes-in-new-yorks-us-house-race-20th-district/comment-page-1/#comment-704821</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 21:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=5984#comment-704821</guid>
		<description>On the absentee ballots that still had his name on them, how did the Libertarian Party candidate do?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the absentee ballots that still had his name on them, how did the Libertarian Party candidate do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

