<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Mexico Secretary of State Says Greens are Not a Qualified Party</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/04/27/new-mexico-secretary-of-state-says-greens-are-not-a-qualified-party/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/04/27/new-mexico-secretary-of-state-says-greens-are-not-a-qualified-party/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 10:13:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3680</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Riley</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/04/27/new-mexico-secretary-of-state-says-greens-are-not-a-qualified-party/comment-page-1/#comment-707179</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Riley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 16:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=6014#comment-707179</guid>
		<description>#4 Rick Lass was a candidate for a &lt;i&gt;district&lt;/i&gt; seat on the New Mexico Regulation Commission for which there was no Republican candidate.  On the SOS site, the NMRC result appear after the district legislative races, presumably reflecting the ballot order as well.  Santa Fe County is split among three districts (considering that there are only 5 districts, there are an obscene amount of county splits).

The Democrat candidate, Jerome Block, &lt;b&gt;Jr.&lt;/b&gt; was nominated in a 6-way primary in which he received 23% of the vote, and may have been mistaken for his father (Jerome Block, &lt;b&gt;Sr.&lt;/b&gt;) who had previously served for 18 years on the commission or its predecessor agency.

During the campaign he was under attack for misreporting campaign expenditures (he and his father were indicted earlier this month).  He had paid $2500 out of public campaign funds to a county clerk who happened to be a member of a band that never performed at a campaign rally.

The presidential candidate Cynthia McKinney of the Green Party received 17 votes in Los Alamos County (0.15%) and good for a 6th place finish behind Obama, McCain, Nader, Barr, and Baldwin.

In Santa Fe County, she received 148 votes (0.20%), but did finish ahead of Chuck Baldwin.

New Mexico should eliminate partisan primaries like Washington, Louisiana, and Nebraska have done, and the legislature has proposed in California.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#4 Rick Lass was a candidate for a <i>district</i> seat on the New Mexico Regulation Commission for which there was no Republican candidate.  On the SOS site, the NMRC result appear after the district legislative races, presumably reflecting the ballot order as well.  Santa Fe County is split among three districts (considering that there are only 5 districts, there are an obscene amount of county splits).</p>
<p>The Democrat candidate, Jerome Block, <b>Jr.</b> was nominated in a 6-way primary in which he received 23% of the vote, and may have been mistaken for his father (Jerome Block, <b>Sr.</b>) who had previously served for 18 years on the commission or its predecessor agency.</p>
<p>During the campaign he was under attack for misreporting campaign expenditures (he and his father were indicted earlier this month).  He had paid $2500 out of public campaign funds to a county clerk who happened to be a member of a band that never performed at a campaign rally.</p>
<p>The presidential candidate Cynthia McKinney of the Green Party received 17 votes in Los Alamos County (0.15%) and good for a 6th place finish behind Obama, McCain, Nader, Barr, and Baldwin.</p>
<p>In Santa Fe County, she received 148 votes (0.20%), but did finish ahead of Chuck Baldwin.</p>
<p>New Mexico should eliminate partisan primaries like Washington, Louisiana, and Nebraska have done, and the legislature has proposed in California.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michal</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/04/27/new-mexico-secretary-of-state-says-greens-are-not-a-qualified-party/comment-page-1/#comment-706802</link>
		<dc:creator>Michal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 22:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=6014#comment-706802</guid>
		<description>Well it&#039;s a certainty that we will fight this one way or another and continue to point out the absurdity of New Mexico&#039;s ballot circus. 
 
With our restrictive national laws and undemocratic debate structure in place, it only follows that it is extremely difficult to garner enough votes at the top ticket level to base qualifications for state ballots on . . .  especially when those laws vary from state to state and exist at the discretion of lawmakers already aligned with the two major parties.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well it&#8217;s a certainty that we will fight this one way or another and continue to point out the absurdity of New Mexico&#8217;s ballot circus. </p>
<p>With our restrictive national laws and undemocratic debate structure in place, it only follows that it is extremely difficult to garner enough votes at the top ticket level to base qualifications for state ballots on . . .  especially when those laws vary from state to state and exist at the discretion of lawmakers already aligned with the two major parties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ETJB</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/04/27/new-mexico-secretary-of-state-says-greens-are-not-a-qualified-party/comment-page-1/#comment-706750</link>
		<dc:creator>ETJB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 20:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=6014#comment-706750</guid>
		<description>This seems a bit silly.  The simple solution would be to look at the political parties that -- at the last preceding presidential election -- had their nominee on the ballot to have a mathetical chance of winning enuough E.C. votes.

That would grant automatical ballot access to about six different parties every four years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems a bit silly.  The simple solution would be to look at the political parties that &#8212; at the last preceding presidential election &#8212; had their nominee on the ballot to have a mathetical chance of winning enuough E.C. votes.</p>
<p>That would grant automatical ballot access to about six different parties every four years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/04/27/new-mexico-secretary-of-state-says-greens-are-not-a-qualified-party/comment-page-1/#comment-706696</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 16:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=6014#comment-706696</guid>
		<description>Think philosophically, Jim.  It is truly absurd, and an obscenity, that New Mexico does not recognize a party that carried Santa Fe County and Los Alamos County for its November 2008 nominee for an important state executive position.  Furthermore, the Greens are the only minor party in New Mexico that has enough registrations to meet the &quot;major party&quot; test.  The whole purpose of laws defining &quot;political party&quot; is to separate out the parties with substantial support, from parties with virtually no support.  The Green Party clearly belongs on the ballot, at least as a qualified minor party, yet New Mexico won&#039;t recognize it even as a minor party.  The law is absurd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think philosophically, Jim.  It is truly absurd, and an obscenity, that New Mexico does not recognize a party that carried Santa Fe County and Los Alamos County for its November 2008 nominee for an important state executive position.  Furthermore, the Greens are the only minor party in New Mexico that has enough registrations to meet the &#8220;major party&#8221; test.  The whole purpose of laws defining &#8220;political party&#8221; is to separate out the parties with substantial support, from parties with virtually no support.  The Green Party clearly belongs on the ballot, at least as a qualified minor party, yet New Mexico won&#8217;t recognize it even as a minor party.  The law is absurd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Riley</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/04/27/new-mexico-secretary-of-state-says-greens-are-not-a-qualified-party/comment-page-1/#comment-706403</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Riley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 05:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=6014#comment-706403</guid>
		<description>Yours is an extremely contrived interpretation (of 1-1-9)

You are interpreting it to say that a party that would be classified as a &quot;major political party&quot; is therefore a &quot;qualified party&quot;.  One might as well argue that a party that would be a &quot;minor political party&quot; is therefore a &quot;qualified party&quot;.

Instead, the requirement is that to be either a &quot;major&quot; or &quot;minor&quot; political party, one must be a a qualified party.  And the Green Party was disqualified due to their low performance at two consecutive elections (under 1-7-2).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yours is an extremely contrived interpretation (of 1-1-9)</p>
<p>You are interpreting it to say that a party that would be classified as a &#8220;major political party&#8221; is therefore a &#8220;qualified party&#8221;.  One might as well argue that a party that would be a &#8220;minor political party&#8221; is therefore a &#8220;qualified party&#8221;.</p>
<p>Instead, the requirement is that to be either a &#8220;major&#8221; or &#8220;minor&#8221; political party, one must be a a qualified party.  And the Green Party was disqualified due to their low performance at two consecutive elections (under 1-7-2).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PTK</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/04/27/new-mexico-secretary-of-state-says-greens-are-not-a-qualified-party/comment-page-1/#comment-706318</link>
		<dc:creator>PTK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 23:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=6014#comment-706318</guid>
		<description>Well I say that the New Mexico Secretary of State is not a qualified person.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I say that the New Mexico Secretary of State is not a qualified person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Demo Rep</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/04/27/new-mexico-secretary-of-state-says-greens-are-not-a-qualified-party/comment-page-1/#comment-706281</link>
		<dc:creator>Demo Rep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 21:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=6014#comment-706281</guid>
		<description>Separate is NOT equal -- for schools and even ballot access  -- regardless of the armies of lawyer MORONS since 1968 in screwing up ballot access.

Brown v. Bd of Ed 1954</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Separate is NOT equal &#8212; for schools and even ballot access  &#8212; regardless of the armies of lawyer MORONS since 1968 in screwing up ballot access.</p>
<p>Brown v. Bd of Ed 1954</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

