<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Constitution Party Launches 2010 Hawaii Petition Drive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/05/19/constitution-party-launches-2010-hawaii-petition-drive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/05/19/constitution-party-launches-2010-hawaii-petition-drive/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 05:30:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1493</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/05/19/constitution-party-launches-2010-hawaii-petition-drive/comment-page-1/#comment-723571</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 22:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=6331#comment-723571</guid>
		<description>Richard - I received an email from the HI office of Elections stating that &quot;date of birth is required no matter what&quot; on the petitions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard &#8211; I received an email from the HI office of Elections stating that &#8220;date of birth is required no matter what&#8221; on the petitions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/05/19/constitution-party-launches-2010-hawaii-petition-drive/comment-page-1/#comment-718793</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 20:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=6331#comment-718793</guid>
		<description>Richard - I believe the date of birth is required.  It&#039;s the SSN that&#039;s not required.  I&#039;ll confirm this next time I talk with the state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard &#8211; I believe the date of birth is required.  It&#8217;s the SSN that&#8217;s not required.  I&#8217;ll confirm this next time I talk with the state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Citizens For A Better Veterans Home</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/05/19/constitution-party-launches-2010-hawaii-petition-drive/comment-page-1/#comment-718728</link>
		<dc:creator>Citizens For A Better Veterans Home</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 19:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=6331#comment-718728</guid>
		<description>[a] More parties, candidates, activists means more democracy!

[b] My telephone conversations with Hawaii Independent Party types [2002, 2005] was always predicated that they were ballot access.

----- Donald Raymond Lake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[a] More parties, candidates, activists means more democracy!</p>
<p>[b] My telephone conversations with Hawaii Independent Party types [2002, 2005] was always predicated that they were ballot access.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8211; Donald Raymond Lake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/05/19/constitution-party-launches-2010-hawaii-petition-drive/comment-page-1/#comment-718691</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 19:20:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=6331#comment-718691</guid>
		<description>Richard - Thanks for posting this.

We will be petitioning, soon, to get the Independent Party of Hawaii back on the ballot for 2010.

As someone who helped with the last two Hawaii petition drives for Nader, 692 is more then we should need to collect, but since we have nearly a year, I anticipate collecting enough valid signatures by the end of this year to qualify (April 1, 2010 deadline).  In 2008 we waited until the last minute, but were able to qualify with the help of a couple of national Nader petitioners, a Green Party petitioner, and about 15 locals.  And we did learn last year that HI registered voters can sign petitions for more than one party.

Michael - It doesn&#039;t matter which county or district the signatures come from.  Political party&#039;s are required to have at least one party officer from each of the 4 counties tho.  Petition signers provide their name, physical address at which they are registered to vote (no mailing addresses) and date of birth.  There is a place for social security # but that is NOT required by law.  My experience with the state of HI is that they can be picky, but since we can turn petitions in as we fill them out we will be able to know exactly where we stand in the process until we get to the magic #.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard &#8211; Thanks for posting this.</p>
<p>We will be petitioning, soon, to get the Independent Party of Hawaii back on the ballot for 2010.</p>
<p>As someone who helped with the last two Hawaii petition drives for Nader, 692 is more then we should need to collect, but since we have nearly a year, I anticipate collecting enough valid signatures by the end of this year to qualify (April 1, 2010 deadline).  In 2008 we waited until the last minute, but were able to qualify with the help of a couple of national Nader petitioners, a Green Party petitioner, and about 15 locals.  And we did learn last year that HI registered voters can sign petitions for more than one party.</p>
<p>Michael &#8211; It doesn&#8217;t matter which county or district the signatures come from.  Political party&#8217;s are required to have at least one party officer from each of the 4 counties tho.  Petition signers provide their name, physical address at which they are registered to vote (no mailing addresses) and date of birth.  There is a place for social security # but that is NOT required by law.  My experience with the state of HI is that they can be picky, but since we can turn petitions in as we fill them out we will be able to know exactly where we stand in the process until we get to the magic #.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/05/19/constitution-party-launches-2010-hawaii-petition-drive/comment-page-1/#comment-718688</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 19:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=6331#comment-718688</guid>
		<description>Hawaii has no distribution requirement for its petition.  But, signers must provide either their birthday (including year, which many people are sensitive about), or the last 4 digits of their social security number.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hawaii has no distribution requirement for its petition.  But, signers must provide either their birthday (including year, which many people are sensitive about), or the last 4 digits of their social security number.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/05/19/constitution-party-launches-2010-hawaii-petition-drive/comment-page-1/#comment-718639</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 18:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=6331#comment-718639</guid>
		<description>I wonder just how many sub-rules there are in getting those 692 signatures? By county? By district? Which further information do those signing have to provide? Ect, ect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder just how many sub-rules there are in getting those 692 signatures? By county? By district? Which further information do those signing have to provide? Ect, ect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David from TX</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/05/19/constitution-party-launches-2010-hawaii-petition-drive/comment-page-1/#comment-717542</link>
		<dc:creator>David from TX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 01:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=6331#comment-717542</guid>
		<description>As some one who has done it before - it takes quite a bit of work for one person to get 500-600 valid signiture for a petition.  It of course can be done but it takes time and effort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As some one who has done it before &#8211; it takes quite a bit of work for one person to get 500-600 valid signiture for a petition.  It of course can be done but it takes time and effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/05/19/constitution-party-launches-2010-hawaii-petition-drive/comment-page-1/#comment-717497</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 22:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=6331#comment-717497</guid>
		<description>Hawaii is very prone to invalidate signatures on petitions.  Generally half the signatures are deemed invalid.  So the petition isn&#039;t as easy as it looks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hawaii is very prone to invalidate signatures on petitions.  Generally half the signatures are deemed invalid.  So the petition isn&#8217;t as easy as it looks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Third Party Revolution</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/05/19/constitution-party-launches-2010-hawaii-petition-drive/comment-page-1/#comment-717435</link>
		<dc:creator>Third Party Revolution</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 20:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=6331#comment-717435</guid>
		<description>692 people is not alot. You can get ANY party ballot-qualified.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>692 people is not alot. You can get ANY party ballot-qualified.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross Levin</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/05/19/constitution-party-launches-2010-hawaii-petition-drive/comment-page-1/#comment-717203</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross Levin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 16:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=6331#comment-717203</guid>
		<description>These parties only need 692 signatures by November 2010?  Why the hell aren&#039;t they doing something?  I mean, if there&#039;s just one person in Hawaii for each party they could probably qualify them for the ballot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These parties only need 692 signatures by November 2010?  Why the hell aren&#8217;t they doing something?  I mean, if there&#8217;s just one person in Hawaii for each party they could probably qualify them for the ballot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

