Comments on: Presidential Candidate Birth Certificate Bill in Congress Gains 3 Texas Co-Sponsors

By: Pope

Pope — Wed, 24 Jun 2009 13:16:52 +0000

This is all BS, you need to show your BC to get a drivers license so how in the world could someone get on a ballot without proving their citizenship? I think anyone that doesn’t see the importance of this issue should pack their bags and head for Iran where legal elections don’t matter. Where anyone with enough money or influence can dictate to the masses. Have we lost our minds?, This isn’t a game, this is our very country we need to honor those who have died for it by at the very least upholding the laws of this land.

By: Randwulf

Randwulf — Sat, 20 Jun 2009 02:30:31 +0000

Noway2no, Semper Fi!

Alfturd, my shrink told me to tell you to cut your own F@cking head off with a dull deer antler. You and yours make me angry with the world and when you are all gone, I will be quite happy and at peace.

Shalom Bubbie!

By: Alferd

Alferd — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 21:21:34 +0000

Randwulf, You need to seriously consider why you are so angry at the world. See a doctor if that helps.

By: Alferd

Alferd — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 21:20:05 +0000

Noway2no, so? what are you planning?

By: Noway2no

Noway2no — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 20:53:27 +0000

Semper Fi! I took an oath in 1979 to defend the constitution and it is still in effect.

By: Randwulf

Randwulf — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 19:16:37 +0000

Cecelia and Noway2no both made very good points. Sometimes I think there may be hope yet.

By: Noway2no

Noway2no — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 18:52:06 +0000

Remember when the commies wanted us all to “question authority”, where has their curiosity gone?

By: Cecelia

Cecelia — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:53:30 +0000

Personally, I don’t think it matters what his birth certificate ends up looking like. Presidential candidates are supposed to be from 2 parents who are BOTH American citizens, and regardless of what his birth certificate says, we already know this isn’t the case.

By: Randwulf

Randwulf — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:38:47 +0000

One of Obama’s birth certificate sites is now showing an image in which we see this number 151 1961-010641. I assume that this would also be the same number that one would find on any original certificate of live birth if there is one. So somewhere on the rolls of live birth registrations in Hawaii or for foreign births registered there, on or about the dates of August 4-12,1961 there should be an entry with this number along with other pertinent information about it. And in one of the file cabinets in the Hawaiian records vaults there should still be an actual piece of paper containing this number that we can find and physically examine (unless it has mysteriously disappeared). Or we may find that this number was used on some other person’s birth certificate altogether. Wouldn’t that be an interesting twist. Maybe it belonged to someone who died early in life and is now being used on the BHO COLB which is currently being professionally created and aged by forgery experts. Well, all we have to do is start following the paper trails for 48 years and we find the truth at some point. Or we will have a lot more questions.

By: Pete

Pete — Fri, 19 Jun 2009 16:15:29 +0000

Hey Alftird, your BS does not answer the question as to why Obama refuses to produce a copy of the vault birth certificate. It is available, I posted the law above.

The issue here is how a candidate was allowed to be placed on a primary ballot without being properly vetted. It should never have happened. The Democratic party was more interested in winning than the interests of the voter. The Democratic party and the Federal Election Commission are at fault here. Abdicating the vetting process to factcheck and a photo shopped version of a short form abstract of birth does not equate to vetting. Will the evidence when it becomes available show this is voter fraud? There is much at stake over the answer to these questions.

The viability of our election system has to be based on confidence that the candidates presented by a party are qualified. This question has never been answered for Obama. So the laws being put in place to require proper vetting should be applauded. Somehow you are trying to argue there should be no standard and no one responsible for the threshold question of whether a candidate is qualified for the position they seek.

So Altird, once again post a cite to any statement from the Democratic National Committee or the Federal Election Commission wherein they state Obama was thoroughly vetted for the office. If you cannot then please stop posting the tripe you continue to spew.

A further concern for Obama are the declarations under penalty of perjury that he filed in many States stating he is a natural born citizen. Should it be shown he lied there will be repercussions for him. Here is an example of the declarations he signed under penalty of perjury:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/11107727/Barack-Obama-Presidential-Candidate-Nomination-Paper-State-of-Arizona-2007