<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UN Committee Urges U.S. to Expedite Self-Determination Vote in Puerto Rico</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/06/17/un-committee-urges-us-to-expedite-self-determination-vote-in-puerto-rico/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/06/17/un-committee-urges-us-to-expedite-self-determination-vote-in-puerto-rico/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 10:38:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=7925</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: V. Iriarte</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/06/17/un-committee-urges-us-to-expedite-self-determination-vote-in-puerto-rico/comment-page-1/#comment-744957</link>
		<dc:creator>V. Iriarte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 20:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=6792#comment-744957</guid>
		<description>Puerto Rico should be independent!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Puerto Rico should be independent!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darryl W. Perry</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/06/17/un-committee-urges-us-to-expedite-self-determination-vote-in-puerto-rico/comment-page-1/#comment-736688</link>
		<dc:creator>Darryl W. Perry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 04:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=6792#comment-736688</guid>
		<description>The one thing this bill calls for, unlike past votes; is a two-part vote.

&quot;The Government of Puerto Rico is authorized to conduct a plebiscite in Puerto Rico. The 2 options set forth on the ballot shall be preceded by the following statement: `Instructions: Mark one of the following 2 options:
`(1) Puerto Rico should continue to have its present form of political status. If you agree, mark here XX.
`(2) Puerto Rico should have a different political status. If you agree, mark here XX.&#039;.&quot;


&quot;Procedure if Majority in First Plebiscite Favors Option 2- If a majority of the ballots in a plebiscite conducted pursuant to subsection (a) or (b) are cast in favor of Option 2, the Government of Puerto Rico is authorized to conduct a plebiscite on the following 3 options:

(1) Independence: Puerto Rico should become fully independent from the United States. If you agree, mark here XX.

(2) Sovereignty in Association with the United States: Puerto Rico and the United States should form a political association between sovereign nations that will not be subject to the Territorial Clause of the United States Constitution. If you agree, mark here XX.

(3) Statehood: Puerto Rico should be admitted as a State of the Union. If you agree, mark here XX.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The one thing this bill calls for, unlike past votes; is a two-part vote.</p>
<p>&#8220;The Government of Puerto Rico is authorized to conduct a plebiscite in Puerto Rico. The 2 options set forth on the ballot shall be preceded by the following statement: `Instructions: Mark one of the following 2 options:<br />
`(1) Puerto Rico should continue to have its present form of political status. If you agree, mark here XX.<br />
`(2) Puerto Rico should have a different political status. If you agree, mark here XX.&#8217;.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Procedure if Majority in First Plebiscite Favors Option 2- If a majority of the ballots in a plebiscite conducted pursuant to subsection (a) or (b) are cast in favor of Option 2, the Government of Puerto Rico is authorized to conduct a plebiscite on the following 3 options:</p>
<p>(1) Independence: Puerto Rico should become fully independent from the United States. If you agree, mark here XX.</p>
<p>(2) Sovereignty in Association with the United States: Puerto Rico and the United States should form a political association between sovereign nations that will not be subject to the Territorial Clause of the United States Constitution. If you agree, mark here XX.</p>
<p>(3) Statehood: Puerto Rico should be admitted as a State of the Union. If you agree, mark here XX.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Kail</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/06/17/un-committee-urges-us-to-expedite-self-determination-vote-in-puerto-rico/comment-page-1/#comment-736654</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Kail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 01:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=6792#comment-736654</guid>
		<description>For their sake, I don&#039;t want Puerto Rico as our 51st state, but they&#039;ve been in limbo for too long.  Give them a chance to get in or get out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For their sake, I don&#8217;t want Puerto Rico as our 51st state, but they&#8217;ve been in limbo for too long.  Give them a chance to get in or get out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billvanallen</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/06/17/un-committee-urges-us-to-expedite-self-determination-vote-in-puerto-rico/comment-page-1/#comment-736633</link>
		<dc:creator>billvanallen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=6792#comment-736633</guid>
		<description>JUNE 18, 2009, 6:58 P.M. ET.Two Senate Lawmakers Request Expedited Sotomayor Records 
.ArticleCommentsmore in Business Â».By Kristina Peterson 

Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES 

WASHINGTON (Dow Jones)--The top two members of the Senate Judiciary Committee made a bipartisan request Thursday for more of U.S. Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor&#039;s records from the Puerto Rican legal aid group where she was a member for 12 years. 

Senators Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., and Jeff....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JUNE 18, 2009, 6:58 P.M. ET.Two Senate Lawmakers Request Expedited Sotomayor Records<br />
.ArticleCommentsmore in Business Â».By Kristina Peterson </p>
<p>Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES </p>
<p>WASHINGTON (Dow Jones)&#8211;The top two members of the Senate Judiciary Committee made a bipartisan request Thursday for more of U.S. Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor&#8217;s records from the Puerto Rican legal aid group where she was a member for 12 years. </p>
<p>Senators Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., and Jeff&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ETJB</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/06/17/un-committee-urges-us-to-expedite-self-determination-vote-in-puerto-rico/comment-page-1/#comment-736402</link>
		<dc:creator>ETJB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=6792#comment-736402</guid>
		<description>Well, the bill would probably call for another Ref type event that did happen sometime in the early 1990s and almost backed Statehood.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the bill would probably call for another Ref type event that did happen sometime in the early 1990s and almost backed Statehood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pedro Animala</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/06/17/un-committee-urges-us-to-expedite-self-determination-vote-in-puerto-rico/comment-page-1/#comment-736297</link>
		<dc:creator>Pedro Animala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=6792#comment-736297</guid>
		<description>Another waste of time and money. How could a process dictated by politicians whose only interests are to defend their coffers, be called &quot;democratic&quot;? We&#039;ve traveled this road so many times and, the end result is always the same, nothing, zero, nada.

Why would Sotomayor be interested in this during her nomination process? The senate of always more interested in rowe v wade, &quot;separation&quot; of powers, and about the existence of the christian god.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another waste of time and money. How could a process dictated by politicians whose only interests are to defend their coffers, be called &#8220;democratic&#8221;? We&#8217;ve traveled this road so many times and, the end result is always the same, nothing, zero, nada.</p>
<p>Why would Sotomayor be interested in this during her nomination process? The senate of always more interested in rowe v wade, &#8220;separation&#8221; of powers, and about the existence of the christian god.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billvanallen</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/06/17/un-committee-urges-us-to-expedite-self-determination-vote-in-puerto-rico/comment-page-1/#comment-735751</link>
		<dc:creator>billvanallen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 03:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=6792#comment-735751</guid>
		<description>CJ S. Sotomayor would be very interested in this issue -- and may not be able to resist discussing it at her nomination hearing next month.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CJ S. Sotomayor would be very interested in this issue &#8212; and may not be able to resist discussing it at her nomination hearing next month.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darryl W. Perry</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/06/17/un-committee-urges-us-to-expedite-self-determination-vote-in-puerto-rico/comment-page-1/#comment-735741</link>
		<dc:creator>Darryl W. Perry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 02:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=6792#comment-735741</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m happy to see Ron Paul as a co-sponsor!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m happy to see Ron Paul as a co-sponsor!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

