<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New York Park District Votes to Let Non-Property Owners Vote</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/06/21/new-york-park-district-votes-to-let-non-property-owners-vote/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/06/21/new-york-park-district-votes-to-let-non-property-owners-vote/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 06:50:36 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Demo Rep</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/06/21/new-york-park-district-votes-to-let-non-property-owners-vote/comment-page-1/#comment-738233</link>
		<dc:creator>Demo Rep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 18:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=6849#comment-738233</guid>
		<description>Kramer was one more MORON opinion by the party hack Supremes.

The Congress in 1866 knew all about elector qualifications in LOCAL elections in the States when it changed the original proposed 14th Amdt, Sec. 2 to have a LIMITED number of major offices in the final language.

Proper remedy - a constitutional amendment having a uniform *positive* definition of Elector in ALL of the U.S.A. -- and  remove all the *negative* elector definition stuff in the Constitution.

----
#1 Same problem with ALL taxes/fees if one does not reside in the area having the taxes/fees -- inter-city, inter-county, inter-State, inter-Nation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kramer was one more MORON opinion by the party hack Supremes.</p>
<p>The Congress in 1866 knew all about elector qualifications in LOCAL elections in the States when it changed the original proposed 14th Amdt, Sec. 2 to have a LIMITED number of major offices in the final language.</p>
<p>Proper remedy &#8211; a constitutional amendment having a uniform *positive* definition of Elector in ALL of the U.S.A. &#8212; and  remove all the *negative* elector definition stuff in the Constitution.</p>
<p>&#8212;-<br />
#1 Same problem with ALL taxes/fees if one does not reside in the area having the taxes/fees &#8212; inter-city, inter-county, inter-State, inter-Nation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: citizen1</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/06/21/new-york-park-district-votes-to-let-non-property-owners-vote/comment-page-1/#comment-738230</link>
		<dc:creator>citizen1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 18:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=6849#comment-738230</guid>
		<description>What about those who own property but do not live in a district? They pay taxes but do not get the right to vote. Taxation without representation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about those who own property but do not live in a district? They pay taxes but do not get the right to vote. Taxation without representation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
