<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tucson Will Sue to Keep Partisan City Elections</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/08/06/tucson-will-sue-to-keep-partisan-city-elections/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/08/06/tucson-will-sue-to-keep-partisan-city-elections/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 09:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=8334</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/08/06/tucson-will-sue-to-keep-partisan-city-elections/comment-page-1/#comment-763929</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 00:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=7563#comment-763929</guid>
		<description>There is an Arizona precedent that supports Tucson in this matter.  It&#039;s all a matter of state law.  Each state has its own ideas on how much autonomy cities have from state laws.  And partisan elections are in Tucson&#039;s charter and the Tucson voters have several times voted in favor of partisan elections.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is an Arizona precedent that supports Tucson in this matter.  It&#8217;s all a matter of state law.  Each state has its own ideas on how much autonomy cities have from state laws.  And partisan elections are in Tucson&#8217;s charter and the Tucson voters have several times voted in favor of partisan elections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Rankin</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/08/06/tucson-will-sue-to-keep-partisan-city-elections/comment-page-1/#comment-763928</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Rankin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 00:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=7563#comment-763928</guid>
		<description>What are your thoughts on this suit, Richard?

Are there any precedents for this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are your thoughts on this suit, Richard?</p>
<p>Are there any precedents for this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

