Comments on: FEC Releases 2008 Election Returns for Federal Office http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/08/07/fec-releases-2008-election-returns-for-federal-office/ Sun, 12 Feb 2012 05:30:10 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=1141 By: Demo Rep http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/08/07/fec-releases-2008-election-returns-for-federal-office/comment-page-1/#comment-764572 Demo Rep Sat, 08 Aug 2009 06:04:25 +0000 http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=7571#comment-764572 Genius math folks on this list -- take note in the gerrymander stats of -- 1. the UNEQUAL votes for each gerrymander area winner, and 2. the UNEQUAL total votes in each gerrymander area. -- resulting in the EVIL indirect minority rule in electing both houses of the Congress and the Prez/VP -- since 1789. [really EVIL for the U.S.A. Senate] REAL Democracy NOW -- 1. Total Votes / Total Seats = EQUAL votes for each winner = P.R. 2. Approval Voting for electing NONPARTISAN executive and judicial officers -- vote for 1 or more, highest win (who have the highest *approval/acceptable* votes). Genius math folks on this list — take note in the gerrymander stats of –

1. the UNEQUAL votes for each gerrymander area winner, and

2. the UNEQUAL total votes in each gerrymander area.

– resulting in the EVIL indirect minority rule in electing both houses of the Congress and the Prez/VP — since 1789. [really EVIL for the U.S.A. Senate]

REAL Democracy NOW –

1. Total Votes / Total Seats = EQUAL votes for each winner = P.R.

2. Approval Voting for electing NONPARTISAN executive and judicial officers — vote for 1 or more, highest win (who have the highest *approval/acceptable* votes).

]]>