Obama Qualifications Lawsuit in Santa Ana, California, Switches Lead Plaintiff

The case pending in U.S. District Court in Orange County, California, on the subject of President Obama’s qualifications, has changed its lead plaintiff. Formerly, the case was known as Alan Keyes v Barack Obama. Keyes is still a co-plaintiff, but the lead plaintiff is now Pamela Barnett, an officer of the U.S. military, so the case will in the future be called Barnett v Obama. Thanks to Bill Van Allen for this news.


Comments

Obama Qualifications Lawsuit in Santa Ana, California, Switches Lead Plaintiff — 7 Comments

  1. Wait to Monday, August 10th and the major changes
    will happen again. Markham Robinson and Wiley Drake will be in the case with new attorneys.

    Sincerely, Mark Seidenberg, Vice Chairman, American
    Independent Party

  2. It matters not whose name is on this junk lawsuit. The case is moot, as the determination of qualifications for President was vested with Congress in the Constititution. Congress certified President Obama’s qualifications, properly so, as he has a valid birth certificate (the only type issued by the State of Hawaii) proving his birth in Hawaii and vouched for by the officials of that state. We certainly don’t need activist judges trying to circumvent the authority of Congress and the states, nor will any judge do so.

  3. Why does anti-Prop 8 activist Mark Seidenberg continue to beat this dead horse.

    What folks want to know is who is Seidenberg getting his marching orders from?

    Pat Nolan, Rahm Emmanual, who Seidenberg?

  4. Hey van fraudster, why don’t you get over it? You’re the ctook who can’t get over an election that is over.

    Bill van allen is a liar and a fraud. He GUARANTEED Obama would resign by July 4, 2009. If he says it’s sunny, take an umbrella.

  5. Mark: If all Drake and Robinson wanted was different counsel they should have merely asked to substitute counsel. What they did is asked out of the case due to fundamental differences with Orly (gee, I can’t imagine that) AND that the case was filed in the wrong venue, federal court rather than state court.

    So now you’re saying they’re going to ask to rejoin the case as plaintiffs, working at cross purposes with Orly, and oh, yeah, never mind the case is in the proper venue after all, we were just kidding.

    Talk about a major face plant for Judge Carter. 😉

  6. I love the birthers. Taking the Republican Party down, down, down. 🙂

    No matter if the obscure American Independent Party is part of it, or the PUMA’s, the Republicans will take the hit.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.