Comments on: Carl Romanelli Asks Pennsylvania Supreme Court to Reconsider Fees

By: SEbastian

SEbastian — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 15:33:31 +0000

Democrats have nothing to do with democracy (democracy;
a system of government by the whole population or all the eligible members of a state)

By: Jeffrey

Jeffrey — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 01:12:42 +0000

How can the judge who is a member of the Democratic Party and who is elected as a Democrat preside over law suit brought by the Democratic Party? Judge, jury and executioner and more. The judge is a plaintiff.

By: Richard

Richard — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 00:18:23 +0000

There is a federal court case pending, so that is an alternative hope.

By: Richard Kuszmar

Richard Kuszmar — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:26:42 +0000

I guess I don’t understand why he didn’t appeal this to Federal Court. its pretty clear he will never win in the partisan Pennsylvania Courts.

By: Gary

Gary — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:18:19 +0000

I hope he gets the fees waved, but this is no different than the bully, communist thug tactics of Hugo Chavez . . . tactics that the socialist Greens now get to feel first hand. Somehow this looks like justice to me.