Indiana State Appeals Court Strikes Down Voter ID Law On Equality Grounds, Based on State Constitution

On September 17, the Indiana State Court of Appeals struck down the 2005 law that requires voters at the polls to show government photo-ID with an expiration date. The vote was 3-0. Here is the 29-page decision. The case is League of Women Voters of Indiana v Rokita, 49A02-0901-cv-40.

The basis for the decision is the Indiana Constitution, which says “The General Assembly shall not grant to any citizen, or class of citizens, privileges or immunities which upon the same terms, shall not equally belong to all citizens.” The Court found that the voter ID law violates that equal protection clause in two ways: (1) absentee voters don’t need to prove their identity, so the law discriminates against voters who vote at the polls; (2) the law gives an exemption to voters who live in a state licensed care facility when that licensed care facility is the location of the polling place for that precinct, so those voters are being treated better than voters who don’t happen to live in the building that houses the polling place.

It is considered inevitable that the Indiana Secretary of State will appeal to the State Supreme Court. This decision, if it survives, is a good model for the pending North Carolina ballot access case, now pending in North Carolina’s State Court of Appeals. Both cases are similar in that federal courts had already upheld the challenged regulations, and the plaintiffs are depending on greater protections found in State Constitutions than in the U.S. Constitution. Thanks to Rick Hasen for the link.


Comments

Indiana State Appeals Court Strikes Down Voter ID Law On Equality Grounds, Based on State Constitution — 2 Comments

  1. The *equally* [adverb] in the IN Constitution is somehow different than the *equal* [adjective] in the equal protection clause in 14th Amdt, Sec. 1 in the U.S.A. Constitution ???

    An extra *ly* at the end of *equal* — Gee – a giant difference.

    Truly amazing how many New Age MORON judges there are in the U.S.A. with their nonstop super hair splitting in their many MORON opinions — especially by the party hack U.S.A. Supremes — who continuously lack a knowledge of the English language and legal history.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.