<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: South Carolina Green Party Case Moves Ahead in 4th Circuit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/09/21/south-carolina-green-party-case-moves-ahead-in-4th-circuit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/09/21/south-carolina-green-party-case-moves-ahead-in-4th-circuit/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 11:51:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2243</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Platt</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/09/21/south-carolina-green-party-case-moves-ahead-in-4th-circuit/comment-page-1/#comment-778770</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Platt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 00:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=8162#comment-778770</guid>
		<description>I think there are candidates who would seek minor party nominations after winning a major party nod (if the timeline allowed for it).  The idea is to get as much support as possible and getting votes from multiple party lines is a plus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there are candidates who would seek minor party nominations after winning a major party nod (if the timeline allowed for it).  The idea is to get as much support as possible and getting votes from multiple party lines is a plus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: South Carolina Green Party Case Moves Ahead in 4th Circuit &#124; Independent Political Report</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/09/21/south-carolina-green-party-case-moves-ahead-in-4th-circuit/comment-page-1/#comment-778456</link>
		<dc:creator>South Carolina Green Party Case Moves Ahead in 4th Circuit &#124; Independent Political Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 22:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=8162#comment-778456</guid>
		<description>[...] Ballot Access News: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ballot Access News: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/09/21/south-carolina-green-party-case-moves-ahead-in-4th-circuit/comment-page-1/#comment-778441</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 16:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=8162#comment-778441</guid>
		<description>The law is neutral between major and minor parties. But the scenario you suggest wouldn&#039;t happen.  Someone who won a major party primary wouldn&#039;t be motivated to then seek a minor party&#039;s convention nomination.  And the convention couldn&#039;t force him or her to seek the nomination.  If the candidate hadn&#039;t submitted an advance declaration of candidacy for that particular minor party, the minor party convention couldn&#039;t bring up his or her name at the convention for possible nomination.  Someone can&#039;t be nominated at a convention against his or her will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The law is neutral between major and minor parties. But the scenario you suggest wouldn&#8217;t happen.  Someone who won a major party primary wouldn&#8217;t be motivated to then seek a minor party&#8217;s convention nomination.  And the convention couldn&#8217;t force him or her to seek the nomination.  If the candidate hadn&#8217;t submitted an advance declaration of candidacy for that particular minor party, the minor party convention couldn&#8217;t bring up his or her name at the convention for possible nomination.  Someone can&#8217;t be nominated at a convention against his or her will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Rankin</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/09/21/south-carolina-green-party-case-moves-ahead-in-4th-circuit/comment-page-1/#comment-778436</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Rankin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 11:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=8162#comment-778436</guid>
		<description>Richard:  Does the law say that the first party to nominate the candidate must be a minor party?

Or could a candidate who wins a major party&#039;s primary and THEN runs unsuccessfully for a minor party&#039;s nomination be disqualified as the major party&#039;s nominee?

Of course, it could be that SC&#039;s minor parties never nominate after the major party primaries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard:  Does the law say that the first party to nominate the candidate must be a minor party?</p>
<p>Or could a candidate who wins a major party&#8217;s primary and THEN runs unsuccessfully for a minor party&#8217;s nomination be disqualified as the major party&#8217;s nominee?</p>
<p>Of course, it could be that SC&#8217;s minor parties never nominate after the major party primaries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

