<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Texas Democratic Party Submits its Rules on Presidential Caucuses to U.S. Justice Department</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/09/21/texas-democratic-party-submits-its-rules-on-presidential-caucuses-to-u-s-justice-department/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/09/21/texas-democratic-party-submits-its-rules-on-presidential-caucuses-to-u-s-justice-department/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 13:28:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2224</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Demo Rep</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/09/21/texas-democratic-party-submits-its-rules-on-presidential-caucuses-to-u-s-justice-department/comment-page-1/#comment-778447</link>
		<dc:creator>Demo Rep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 20:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=8160#comment-778447</guid>
		<description>The party hacks in the various parties are NOT independent empires from outer space.

EVERYTHING connected with the PUBLIC nomination / PUBLIC election process is subject to the LAW.

The VRA has been totally screwed up since 1965 -- due to the various MORONS in the Supremes who have been destroying the State regimes since 1936.

Each State is a sovereign NATION-State (since 4 July 1776 and the 1783 Peace Treaty) with the U.S.A. regime being a super-national regime for the States.

See Const. Art. VII -- always ignored by armies of MORON lawyers and the Supremes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The party hacks in the various parties are NOT independent empires from outer space.</p>
<p>EVERYTHING connected with the PUBLIC nomination / PUBLIC election process is subject to the LAW.</p>
<p>The VRA has been totally screwed up since 1965 &#8212; due to the various MORONS in the Supremes who have been destroying the State regimes since 1936.</p>
<p>Each State is a sovereign NATION-State (since 4 July 1776 and the 1783 Peace Treaty) with the U.S.A. regime being a super-national regime for the States.</p>
<p>See Const. Art. VII &#8212; always ignored by armies of MORON lawyers and the Supremes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ballot Access News Â» Blog Archive Â» Texas Democratic Party Submits &#8230; &#124; Ant Control TX &#124; Control Ants in TX</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/09/21/texas-democratic-party-submits-its-rules-on-presidential-caucuses-to-u-s-justice-department/comment-page-1/#comment-778439</link>
		<dc:creator>Ballot Access News Â» Blog Archive Â» Texas Democratic Party Submits &#8230; &#124; Ant Control TX &#124; Control Ants in TX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=8160#comment-778439</guid>
		<description>[...] here: Ballot Access News Â» Blog Archive Â» Texas Democratic Party Submits &#8230;  Tags: 2008-rules, approve-its, democratic, department, national, section, Texas, the-2004, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] here: Ballot Access News Â» Blog Archive Â» Texas Democratic Party Submits &#8230;  Tags: 2008-rules, approve-its, democratic, department, national, section, Texas, the-2004, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/09/21/texas-democratic-party-submits-its-rules-on-presidential-caucuses-to-u-s-justice-department/comment-page-1/#comment-778429</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 02:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=8160#comment-778429</guid>
		<description>Probably the national Democratic Party thinks it is protected against having to worry about the Voting Rights Act, because of the decision LaRouche v Democratic National Committee, in which the US Court of Appeals, DC Circuit, said it didn&#039;t need to preclear a rule that even if LaRouche won some delegates (which he did in 1996), he could not receive votes at the national convention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably the national Democratic Party thinks it is protected against having to worry about the Voting Rights Act, because of the decision LaRouche v Democratic National Committee, in which the US Court of Appeals, DC Circuit, said it didn&#8217;t need to preclear a rule that even if LaRouche won some delegates (which he did in 1996), he could not receive votes at the national convention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Riley</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/09/21/texas-democratic-party-submits-its-rules-on-presidential-caucuses-to-u-s-justice-department/comment-page-1/#comment-778424</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Riley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=8160#comment-778424</guid>
		<description>The National Democratic Party also apportions delegates among the States on the basis of each State&#039;s share of the national popular vote in previous elections.

Shouldn&#039;t the NDP also make a submission for its rules, as well as its decision to sanction Florida and Michigan for changing the date of their primary, but not New Hampshire - which quite reasonably was racially discriminatory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The National Democratic Party also apportions delegates among the States on the basis of each State&#8217;s share of the national popular vote in previous elections.</p>
<p>Shouldn&#8217;t the NDP also make a submission for its rules, as well as its decision to sanction Florida and Michigan for changing the date of their primary, but not New Hampshire &#8211; which quite reasonably was racially discriminatory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/09/21/texas-democratic-party-submits-its-rules-on-presidential-caucuses-to-u-s-justice-department/comment-page-1/#comment-778419</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 20:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=8160#comment-778419</guid>
		<description>So, any guess as to how the US Justice Department will rule?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, any guess as to how the US Justice Department will rule?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

