<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Both Sides File Briefs in Green Party of Arkansas Lawsuit on How Parties Remain on the Ballot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/10/21/both-sides-file-briefs-in-green-party-of-arkansas-lawsuit-on-how-parties-remain-on-the-ballot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/10/21/both-sides-file-briefs-in-green-party-of-arkansas-lawsuit-on-how-parties-remain-on-the-ballot/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 13:28:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1741</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Both Sides File Briefs in Green Party of Arkansas Lawsuit on How Parties Remain on the Ballot</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/10/21/both-sides-file-briefs-in-green-party-of-arkansas-lawsuit-on-how-parties-remain-on-the-ballot/comment-page-1/#comment-779736</link>
		<dc:creator>Both Sides File Briefs in Green Party of Arkansas Lawsuit on How Parties Remain on the Ballot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 22:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=8661#comment-779736</guid>
		<description>[...] at Ballot Access News:  On August 27, the Green Party of Arkansas had filed a federal lawsuit, alleging that the vote [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at Ballot Access News:  On August 27, the Green Party of Arkansas had filed a federal lawsuit, alleging that the vote [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. Frank Robinson</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/10/21/both-sides-file-briefs-in-green-party-of-arkansas-lawsuit-on-how-parties-remain-on-the-ballot/comment-page-1/#comment-779731</link>
		<dc:creator>D. Frank Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 21:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=8661#comment-779731</guid>
		<description>There is no rational basis for restricting access to the ballot. If there were, it would justify abolition of all elections. For example, why not require a petition to obtain a majority of the signatures of all citizens and that petition would eliminate the need for any election at since it would merely be redundant? 

Instead, a ballot access petition is tantamount to a special disqualifying election for the purpose of excluding people from representation - a deprivation of citizenship and a grounds for secession. 

All ballot access restrictions are an act of war.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no rational basis for restricting access to the ballot. If there were, it would justify abolition of all elections. For example, why not require a petition to obtain a majority of the signatures of all citizens and that petition would eliminate the need for any election at since it would merely be redundant? </p>
<p>Instead, a ballot access petition is tantamount to a special disqualifying election for the purpose of excluding people from representation &#8211; a deprivation of citizenship and a grounds for secession. </p>
<p>All ballot access restrictions are an act of war.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

