By: steveconn

steveconn — Sun, 08 Nov 2009 17:29:35 +0000

Not mentioned here is that the corporate law firm which organized this campaign against Nader’s ballot access
treated their work as pro bono service for those denied access to legal help in Pennsylvania, not as a favor to
those rich clients who keep the firm in business.

By: A D

A D — Sat, 07 Nov 2009 21:10:24 +0000

IT’S IMPORTANT THAT THE PA. SUPREME COURT, AND ALL OF OUR POLITICOS, MAKE SURE THAT WE THE PEOPLE HAVE NO CHOICE OTHER THAN THE CURRENT, 2-PARTY MONOPOLY. JUST KEEP SADDLING CHALLENGERS, NEW PEOPLE WITH GOOD IDEAS, FELLOW AMERICANS, WITH EXPENSIVE AND TIME-CONSUMING COURT CHALLENGES AND THEN WITH THE COSTS OF SEEKING RELIEF FROM THIS NONSENSE FROM THE COURTS AND, LO AND BEHOLD….THE 2-PARTY MONOPOLY CONTINUES. DEMOCRATS WHO CLAIM THIS AS A ‘WIN’ SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF THEMSELVES.
FOR MORE THAN A MAJORITY OF US WHO NO LONGER VOTE, DEMOCRACY IN AMERICA HAS BECOME A SAD JOKE. FOR MR NADER, FORTUNATELY, WHO KEEPS TRYING, HIS WIN WOULD HERALD A NEW BEGINNING IN AN AMERICA WHERE WE MIGHT BEGIN TO AGAIN BELIEVE IN ‘FREEDOM OF CHOICE’ IN THAT MOST IMPORTANT ASPECT OF OUR AMERICAN LIVES: CHOOSING OUR LEADERS AND FORMING OUR GOVERNMENT.
HERE’S HOPING THE PA. SUPREME COURTS RULES IN FAVOR OF FREEDOM, AND FOR MR NADER AND FOR ALL OF US.

Comments on: Nader Again Asks Pennsylvania Supreme Court to Re-hear 2004 Case on $80,000

By: steveconn

By: A D