Comments on: Arizona Green Party Sues Over Residency Requirement for Petitioners

By: Andy

Andy — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 06:22:11 +0000

“Richard Says:
November 19th, 2009 at 4:33 pm
Yes. The 2009 legislature did not act rationally when it passed a bill that eliminates the restriction for only one type of petition.”

Shouldn’t the court ruling override the legislature and Secretary of State’s office?

By: Demo Rep

Demo Rep — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:41:17 +0000

The courts long ago screwed up the petition stuff in
(A) the 1st Amdt with
(B) ballot access via voter petitions for candidates and ballot issues.

How many States had ANY voter petitions for ANY candidates or ballot issues in 1789-1791 ???

Par for the course in the MORON courts — who absolutely love perverting legal history and the English language.

By: Richard

Richard — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:33:49 +0000

Yes. The 2009 legislature did not act rationally when it passed a bill that eliminates the restriction for only one type of petition.

By: Andy

Andy — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 00:05:05 +0000

Shouldn’t the court ruling in the Nader case have thrown out the out-of-state circulator ban for all types of petitions in Arizona?

By: Demo Rep

Demo Rep — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:41:03 +0000

Bring in armies of FOREIGN folks (legal and illegal) to circulate petitions ???

More and more EVIL stupidity in the courts ??? Duh.

AREA — Citizen Electors-Voters residing in such A-R-E-A = THE political power in such AREA.

Everybody else is an ALIEN — from outer space.

Too much for the MORONS in the courts to understand ???

What day will Civil WAR II start – due to the MORONS in the New Age so-called courts ???