<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: California Court Keeps Public Funding Measure on June 2010 Ballot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/11/19/california-court-keeps-public-funding-measure-on-june-2010-ballot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/11/19/california-court-keeps-public-funding-measure-on-june-2010-ballot/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 12:52:51 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Demo Rep</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/11/19/california-court-keeps-public-funding-measure-on-june-2010-ballot/comment-page-1/#comment-781014</link>
		<dc:creator>Demo Rep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=9185#comment-781014</guid>
		<description>More mindless judicial moronity.

IF a ballot issue is facially UN-constitutional, then it has NO business being on any ballots.

IF it is facially constitutional, then it is OK for it to be on the ballots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More mindless judicial moronity.</p>
<p>IF a ballot issue is facially UN-constitutional, then it has NO business being on any ballots.</p>
<p>IF it is facially constitutional, then it is OK for it to be on the ballots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
