Comments on: Final Brief Filed in 11th Circuit in Georgia Ballot Access Case

By: Demo Rep

Demo Rep — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 02:48:23 +0000

In Brown v. Bd of Ed the genius Supremes finally observed that the Civil War had happened and that 14th Amdt, Sec. 1 had something to do with getting EQUAL civil rights for ALL American citizens — and even overruled lots of their EVIL racist stuff going back to the late 1800s — i.e. Plessy v. Ferguson.

Folks fail to realize how STUPID lawyers are in repeating the same old MORON arguments and somehow expecting different results. — thus the 41 years of UNEQUAL ballot access law cases since Williams v. Rhodes in 1968.

Brown NOT brought up in Williams — due to MORON lawyers and the worse MORON Supremes — even though some of the 1968 Supremes were around for the 1954 Brown case.

There have been about 7 MAJOR screwed up ballot access cases since Williams – ALL of them NOT bringing up Brown.

By: Richard

Richard — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:34:08 +0000

Courts do make significant changes sometimes, even in the absense of a big interest group being involved. In 2008 the court in 3 circuits struck down laws that ban out-of-state circulators, for example.

By: ETJB

ETJB — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:15:23 +0000

Well, surely if Demo Rep can repeat the same slogan again and again…election law reform will magical come about.

The reality, with all due respect, is that unless their is a serious broad based interest group backing ballot access law reforms, little is going to change in court in laws or public opinion.

By: Demo Rep

Demo Rep — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:16:30 +0000

Separate is NOT equal.

Brown v. Bd of Ed 1954

Each election is NEW and has ZERO to do with any prior election.

Too much for MORON lawyers and judges to detect in their MORON brains in ballot access cases.