South Dakota Court Says Inactive Voters May Sign Petitions

On November 13, a South Dakota Circuit Court Judge ruled that petition signatures are valid if the signer is not on the list of active registered voters, but is on the list of inactive voters. Inactive voters are those who once registered to vote, but whose registration is considered questionable because the post office reported that the voter had moved and that voter has not re-registered. The judge, Kathleen Trandahl, also ruled that petition sheets are valid even if the notary public who notarized that sheet makes errors in his or her notarization statement, such as putting an incorrect date on when the notary’s seal expires. The case is Trucano v Nelson, 32-cv-09-306. See this story.

It is possible the state will appeal. UPDATE: on November 20, the state decided not to appeal. The case arose because the state had rejected a referendum petition. The 2009 session of the legislature had passed a bill to ban smoking in bars and casinos. Opponents of that new law had then submitted a petition to call for a public vote, which will be held in November 2010.


Comments

South Dakota Court Says Inactive Voters May Sign Petitions — 4 Comments

  1. How about Star Trek folks lost in outer space going at warp speeds away from Mother Earth in another universe ???

  2. A similar decision was issued by a court in Puerto Rico in 1985, Puerto Rican Renewal Party v. State Elections Commission. In that case the Superior Court stated that requiring a voter to reactivate his/her electoral record to sign a petition to register a political party would be too burdensome, compared to requiring a voter to reactivate his/her record in order to vote.
    Because of that, anyone who has been registered to vote in Puerto Rico can sign to place a political party on the ballot.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.