<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canadian Poll Gives 5 Parties National Support of at Least 10%</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/11/22/canadian-poll-gives-5-parties-national-support-of-at-least-10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/11/22/canadian-poll-gives-5-parties-national-support-of-at-least-10/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 01:14:05 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Demo Rep</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/11/22/canadian-poll-gives-5-parties-national-support-of-at-least-10/comment-page-1/#comment-781172</link>
		<dc:creator>Demo Rep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 06:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=9224#comment-781172</guid>
		<description>P.R. and nonpartisan A.V.

ALL current *parliamentary regimes* (i.e. Canada and the U.K.) are TYRANT REGIMES -- a powermad arrogant EVIL party hack prime minister in control -- with party hack robots in the parliament doing his/her bidding.

At least SOMETHING got learned in the American Revolution -- have the EVIL party hacks NOT hold both legislative and executive offices --- aka the lesson of SEPARATION OF POWERS to reduce the tyrant stuff.

EVIL rotten enough that executive officers in the U.S.A. still have any party hack monarchy vetoes -- carried over from the DARK AGE of divine right of kings.

Canada can go over the edge with any gerrymander plurality election (the MORON phrase - *first past the post* from English horseracing) -- i.e. west - east Civil WAR and/or English - French Civil WAR or both.

The U.S.A. regime will of course intervene and likely wipe out Canada -- and add some more States in the frozen north.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.R. and nonpartisan A.V.</p>
<p>ALL current *parliamentary regimes* (i.e. Canada and the U.K.) are TYRANT REGIMES &#8212; a powermad arrogant EVIL party hack prime minister in control &#8212; with party hack robots in the parliament doing his/her bidding.</p>
<p>At least SOMETHING got learned in the American Revolution &#8212; have the EVIL party hacks NOT hold both legislative and executive offices &#8212; aka the lesson of SEPARATION OF POWERS to reduce the tyrant stuff.</p>
<p>EVIL rotten enough that executive officers in the U.S.A. still have any party hack monarchy vetoes &#8212; carried over from the DARK AGE of divine right of kings.</p>
<p>Canada can go over the edge with any gerrymander plurality election (the MORON phrase &#8211; *first past the post* from English horseracing) &#8212; i.e. west &#8211; east Civil WAR and/or English &#8211; French Civil WAR or both.</p>
<p>The U.S.A. regime will of course intervene and likely wipe out Canada &#8212; and add some more States in the frozen north.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Sawyer</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/11/22/canadian-poll-gives-5-parties-national-support-of-at-least-10/comment-page-1/#comment-781166</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Sawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=9224#comment-781166</guid>
		<description>Actually, I was being serious.  It would be nice if the opposition parties formed an electoral alliance.  Is that too much to hope for?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I was being serious.  It would be nice if the opposition parties formed an electoral alliance.  Is that too much to hope for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: icr</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/11/22/canadian-poll-gives-5-parties-national-support-of-at-least-10/comment-page-1/#comment-781147</link>
		<dc:creator>icr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=9224#comment-781147</guid>
		<description>&quot;That is great news: Fifty-nine percent of the voters appear to be opposed to the Conservative Party!&quot;

I guess you&#039;re being facetious. Under the FPTP  system this breakdown is likely to lead to a Conservative victory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;That is great news: Fifty-nine percent of the voters appear to be opposed to the Conservative Party!&#8221;</p>
<p>I guess you&#8217;re being facetious. Under the FPTP  system this breakdown is likely to lead to a Conservative victory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Sawyer</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/11/22/canadian-poll-gives-5-parties-national-support-of-at-least-10/comment-page-1/#comment-781141</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Sawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 02:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=9224#comment-781141</guid>
		<description>That is great news: Fifty-nine percent of the voters appear to be opposed to the Conservative Party!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is great news: Fifty-nine percent of the voters appear to be opposed to the Conservative Party!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/11/22/canadian-poll-gives-5-parties-national-support-of-at-least-10/comment-page-1/#comment-781136</link>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=9224#comment-781136</guid>
		<description>Oh, Richard, if you keep an eye on this wikipedia page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/41st_Canadian_federal_election it gives weekly or better polls for the five major parties.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, Richard, if you keep an eye on this wikipedia page <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/41st_Canadian_federal_election" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/41st_Canadian_federal_election</a> it gives weekly or better polls for the five major parties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/11/22/canadian-poll-gives-5-parties-national-support-of-at-least-10/comment-page-1/#comment-781134</link>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 21:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=9224#comment-781134</guid>
		<description>If the Libs were willing to go into coalition with the NDP and Greens at the national level, they&#039;d be able to easily change the direction of Canada (as far as I know, they don&#039;t want to join with the Bloc).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the Libs were willing to go into coalition with the NDP and Greens at the national level, they&#8217;d be able to easily change the direction of Canada (as far as I know, they don&#8217;t want to join with the Bloc).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
