<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New California Term Limits Initiative Launched</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/11/25/new-california-term-limits-initiative-launched/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/11/25/new-california-term-limits-initiative-launched/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 05:30:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=6116</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rationality and Science Education</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/11/25/new-california-term-limits-initiative-launched/comment-page-1/#comment-781286</link>
		<dc:creator>Rationality and Science Education</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 22:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=9257#comment-781286</guid>
		<description>And on the county level, 

San Diegians constitute less than 38% GOP,

yet the same ultra conservative types get

re-elected to the five county board of 

[asleep at the wheel] supervisors!

Let the term limits begin .........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And on the county level, </p>
<p>San Diegians constitute less than 38% GOP,</p>
<p>yet the same ultra conservative types get</p>
<p>re-elected to the five county board of </p>
<p>[asleep at the wheel] supervisors!</p>
<p>Let the term limits begin &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Riley</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/11/25/new-california-term-limits-initiative-launched/comment-page-1/#comment-781249</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Riley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 04:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=9257#comment-781249</guid>
		<description>The proponent of the initiative (1395) is Lance Olson.  The proponent of the next 3 (1396-1398) is Lee Olson.  

I read (1395) which includes the cover letter to the SOS from &lt;b&gt;Olson&lt;/b&gt;, and then went back to the Update page, and saw three more initiatives from &lt;b&gt;Olson&lt;/b&gt;.  I thought it kind of weird that since you (Richard Winger) said that the first had substantial financial backing, that they would also be proposing 1396, which proposes that no State taxes be used to fund schools.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The proponent of the initiative (1395) is Lance Olson.  The proponent of the next 3 (1396-1398) is Lee Olson.  </p>
<p>I read (1395) which includes the cover letter to the SOS from <b>Olson</b>, and then went back to the Update page, and saw three more initiatives from <b>Olson</b>.  I thought it kind of weird that since you (Richard Winger) said that the first had substantial financial backing, that they would also be proposing 1396, which proposes that no State taxes be used to fund schools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Demo Rep</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/11/25/new-california-term-limits-initiative-launched/comment-page-1/#comment-781243</link>
		<dc:creator>Demo Rep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 00:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=9257#comment-781243</guid>
		<description>P.R. and nonpartisan A.V.

The term limits mania was due to armies of math MORONS in the 1970s-1980s who were/are brain dead about minority rule gerrymander math.

Half the votes in half the gerrymander districts = about 25 percent indirect minority rule by EVIL leftwing or rightwing statist fanatics - especially in CA -- with about ALL of the gerrymander districts being *ONE party - SAFE SEATS*.

1/2 x 1/2 = 1/4 Dark Age math from the 1200s and the formation of the English House of Commons 

-- with such math carried into the British-American colonies in the 1600s and then into the States in 1776 and then into the U.S.A. regime in 1787-1789.

A MINDLESS area fixation -- as STONE AGE primitive as the flat earth fixation for centuries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.R. and nonpartisan A.V.</p>
<p>The term limits mania was due to armies of math MORONS in the 1970s-1980s who were/are brain dead about minority rule gerrymander math.</p>
<p>Half the votes in half the gerrymander districts = about 25 percent indirect minority rule by EVIL leftwing or rightwing statist fanatics &#8211; especially in CA &#8212; with about ALL of the gerrymander districts being *ONE party &#8211; SAFE SEATS*.</p>
<p>1/2 x 1/2 = 1/4 Dark Age math from the 1200s and the formation of the English House of Commons </p>
<p>&#8211; with such math carried into the British-American colonies in the 1600s and then into the States in 1776 and then into the U.S.A. regime in 1787-1789.</p>
<p>A MINDLESS area fixation &#8212; as STONE AGE primitive as the flat earth fixation for centuries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/11/25/new-california-term-limits-initiative-launched/comment-page-1/#comment-781231</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=9257#comment-781231</guid>
		<description>Will we ever get real election reform on the ballot with proportional representation?  Term limits means nothing when it is the same bought and paid for political parties winning in phony prentend elections.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will we ever get real election reform on the ballot with proportional representation?  Term limits means nothing when it is the same bought and paid for political parties winning in phony prentend elections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

