<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two Libertarians Elected in Partisan Races in Pennsylvania Outpolled All Their Major Party Opponents</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/11/25/two-libertarians-elected-in-partisan-races-in-pennsylvania-earlier-this-month-defeated-democratic-nominees/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/11/25/two-libertarians-elected-in-partisan-races-in-pennsylvania-earlier-this-month-defeated-democratic-nominees/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 15:15:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2445</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/11/25/two-libertarians-elected-in-partisan-races-in-pennsylvania-earlier-this-month-defeated-democratic-nominees/comment-page-1/#comment-781258</link>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=9266#comment-781258</guid>
		<description>Clay Barham, I don&#039;t believe you&#039;ve actually studied any history.

Jefferson was the in the Democratic-Republican Party, which, yes, later split into the Democrat Party, and some members actually left for the Whigs.

In addition, the Democrat Party of today follows none of the economic philosophies of Marx (how I wish they did!).  Marx advocated a takeover of the state by the working class so that the workers would run the government and own the means of production.  The Democrats neither espouse these ideas nor have even hinted at supporting them.  The Democrat Party is just as pro-business and anti-worker (and therefore anti-Marx) as the Republican Party.  &quot;Big government&quot; does not equal &quot;socialism.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clay Barham, I don&#8217;t believe you&#8217;ve actually studied any history.</p>
<p>Jefferson was the in the Democratic-Republican Party, which, yes, later split into the Democrat Party, and some members actually left for the Whigs.</p>
<p>In addition, the Democrat Party of today follows none of the economic philosophies of Marx (how I wish they did!).  Marx advocated a takeover of the state by the working class so that the workers would run the government and own the means of production.  The Democrats neither espouse these ideas nor have even hinted at supporting them.  The Democrat Party is just as pro-business and anti-worker (and therefore anti-Marx) as the Republican Party.  &#8220;Big government&#8221; does not equal &#8220;socialism.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Dondero</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/11/25/two-libertarians-elected-in-partisan-races-in-pennsylvania-earlier-this-month-defeated-democratic-nominees/comment-page-1/#comment-781256</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Dondero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 10:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=9266#comment-781256</guid>
		<description>Has anyone found out yet if that Libertarian running in the Constable race in Erie, PA ultimately won the election?  

He had to draw a ping pong ball out of a box, cause the race with his Republican opponent was tied 4 to 4.  

The drawing was held last Friday at the Courthouse.  I saw an article about it at Erie.com, but they only reported on the top two tied races, and didn&#039;t mention the Constable&#039;s race.  

I&#039;ve got an email into the reporter, but he hasn&#039;t responded yet.  

Winger, have you heard anything yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone found out yet if that Libertarian running in the Constable race in Erie, PA ultimately won the election?  </p>
<p>He had to draw a ping pong ball out of a box, cause the race with his Republican opponent was tied 4 to 4.  </p>
<p>The drawing was held last Friday at the Courthouse.  I saw an article about it at Erie.com, but they only reported on the top two tied races, and didn&#8217;t mention the Constable&#8217;s race.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got an email into the reporter, but he hasn&#8217;t responded yet.  </p>
<p>Winger, have you heard anything yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: An Alabama Independent</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/11/25/two-libertarians-elected-in-partisan-races-in-pennsylvania-earlier-this-month-defeated-democratic-nominees/comment-page-1/#comment-781236</link>
		<dc:creator>An Alabama Independent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 21:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=9266#comment-781236</guid>
		<description>This is the strategy that all 3rd parties need to learn.  While there is nothing wrong with the symbolic Presidential/Vice-Presidential ticket every 4 years, 3rd partisans (and straight out &quot;independents&quot;) need to start on a playing field that is somewhat level and build from there.

While I am not a Libertarian, I still congratulate these candidates for their achievements.  Now, what they need to do is prove to the public that 3rd partisans DO know how to government.  Serve in these local offices with honor and accomplishment, then after a term or two there, seek a higher office - such as a county commission seat or even a state legislative seat - if such are obtainable. And if that next climb is successful, continue the climb in due time.

Eventually, the day will come when voters will accept non-Democratic and non-Republican officeholders as just as qualified and if we show the voters that we can govern, they&#039;ll trust us for the larger offices - someday perhaps the Presidency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the strategy that all 3rd parties need to learn.  While there is nothing wrong with the symbolic Presidential/Vice-Presidential ticket every 4 years, 3rd partisans (and straight out &#8220;independents&#8221;) need to start on a playing field that is somewhat level and build from there.</p>
<p>While I am not a Libertarian, I still congratulate these candidates for their achievements.  Now, what they need to do is prove to the public that 3rd partisans DO know how to government.  Serve in these local offices with honor and accomplishment, then after a term or two there, seek a higher office &#8211; such as a county commission seat or even a state legislative seat &#8211; if such are obtainable. And if that next climb is successful, continue the climb in due time.</p>
<p>Eventually, the day will come when voters will accept non-Democratic and non-Republican officeholders as just as qualified and if we show the voters that we can govern, they&#8217;ll trust us for the larger offices &#8211; someday perhaps the Presidency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clay Barham</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/11/25/two-libertarians-elected-in-partisan-races-in-pennsylvania-earlier-this-month-defeated-democratic-nominees/comment-page-1/#comment-781234</link>
		<dc:creator>Clay Barham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 20:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=9266#comment-781234</guid>
		<description>The first libertarians were the original Democrat Party, where Jefferson was its first up to and including Grover Cleveland, cited in THE CHANGING FACE OF DEMOCRATS on Amazon and claysamerica.com.  They were fixated on state&#039;s rights, keeping the fed small and sticking with a metal standard for money, to prvent what we experience today.  Of course, the modern Democrat follows Rousseau and Marx.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first libertarians were the original Democrat Party, where Jefferson was its first up to and including Grover Cleveland, cited in THE CHANGING FACE OF DEMOCRATS on Amazon and claysamerica.com.  They were fixated on state&#8217;s rights, keeping the fed small and sticking with a metal standard for money, to prvent what we experience today.  Of course, the modern Democrat follows Rousseau and Marx.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

