<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Maine Petition is Under Attack Because Notaries Public Who Certified Petition Sheets Got Married and Didn&#8217;t Change Their Names in State Records</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/11/30/maine-petition-is-under-attack-because-notaries-public-who-certified-petition-sheets-got-married-and-didnt-change-their-names-in-state-records/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/11/30/maine-petition-is-under-attack-because-notaries-public-who-certified-petition-sheets-got-married-and-didnt-change-their-names-in-state-records/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 15:43:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=5277</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maine Green</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/11/30/maine-petition-is-under-attack-because-notaries-public-who-certified-petition-sheets-got-married-and-didnt-change-their-names-in-state-records/comment-page-1/#comment-781391</link>
		<dc:creator>Maine Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 14:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=9315#comment-781391</guid>
		<description>Richard, 

The tax flattens the tax- raising the lowest brackets up to 6.5% and lowering taxes for the uppermost brackets (from a top of 8.5% to 6.75%). It also primarily expands the sales tax rather than raises is. 

Both the Green and Republican parties opposed this measure (albeit for different reasons i think) and collected signatures for the same drive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard, </p>
<p>The tax flattens the tax- raising the lowest brackets up to 6.5% and lowering taxes for the uppermost brackets (from a top of 8.5% to 6.75%). It also primarily expands the sales tax rather than raises is. </p>
<p>Both the Green and Republican parties opposed this measure (albeit for different reasons i think) and collected signatures for the same drive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Winger</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/11/30/maine-petition-is-under-attack-because-notaries-public-who-certified-petition-sheets-got-married-and-didnt-change-their-names-in-state-records/comment-page-1/#comment-781376</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Winger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 02:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=9315#comment-781376</guid>
		<description>The tax law passed by the Maine legislature lowers income tax and raises sales tax.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The tax law passed by the Maine legislature lowers income tax and raises sales tax.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Demo Rep</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/11/30/maine-petition-is-under-attack-because-notaries-public-who-certified-petition-sheets-got-married-and-didnt-change-their-names-in-state-records/comment-page-1/#comment-781375</link>
		<dc:creator>Demo Rep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 01:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=9315#comment-781375</guid>
		<description>#4 -- Depends on the LAW in the area involved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#4 &#8212; Depends on the LAW in the area involved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene Berkman</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/11/30/maine-petition-is-under-attack-because-notaries-public-who-certified-petition-sheets-got-married-and-didnt-change-their-names-in-state-records/comment-page-1/#comment-781372</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene Berkman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 00:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=9315#comment-781372</guid>
		<description>A woman who marries is not required to take her husband&#039;s surname. This is just convention. So the challenge should be thrown out on that basis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A woman who marries is not required to take her husband&#8217;s surname. This is just convention. So the challenge should be thrown out on that basis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Demo Rep's Mom</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/11/30/maine-petition-is-under-attack-because-notaries-public-who-certified-petition-sheets-got-married-and-didnt-change-their-names-in-state-records/comment-page-1/#comment-781369</link>
		<dc:creator>Demo Rep's Mom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 00:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=9315#comment-781369</guid>
		<description>what is the tax overhaul that was implemented by the state legislator?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what is the tax overhaul that was implemented by the state legislator?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/11/30/maine-petition-is-under-attack-because-notaries-public-who-certified-petition-sheets-got-married-and-didnt-change-their-names-in-state-records/comment-page-1/#comment-781367</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 22:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=9315#comment-781367</guid>
		<description>&quot;States that require petition sheets to be notarized open the doors for additional types of challenges. Determined challengers may realize that the petition itself has enough signatures of registered voters, so then the challengers try to find something wrong with the paperwork involving notarization.&quot;

This is one good reason why requirements to notarize petition sheets should be eliminated.  There are already plenty of states that do NOT require petition sheets to be notarized and they get by just fine.  Notarization requirements are just another unnecessary hoop to jump through and a complete waste of time and resources.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;States that require petition sheets to be notarized open the doors for additional types of challenges. Determined challengers may realize that the petition itself has enough signatures of registered voters, so then the challengers try to find something wrong with the paperwork involving notarization.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is one good reason why requirements to notarize petition sheets should be eliminated.  There are already plenty of states that do NOT require petition sheets to be notarized and they get by just fine.  Notarization requirements are just another unnecessary hoop to jump through and a complete waste of time and resources.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Demo Rep</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/11/30/maine-petition-is-under-attack-because-notaries-public-who-certified-petition-sheets-got-married-and-didnt-change-their-names-in-state-records/comment-page-1/#comment-781358</link>
		<dc:creator>Demo Rep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=9315#comment-781358</guid>
		<description>The EVIL Donkey / Elephant party hacks in the various minority rule gerrymander legislative bodies and the special interest gangs want NO opposition to their EVIL laws.

The regimes are now taxing / borrowing / spending about 40 percent of the GDP -- for the benefit mainly of such special interest gangs.

P.R. and nonpartisan A.V.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The EVIL Donkey / Elephant party hacks in the various minority rule gerrymander legislative bodies and the special interest gangs want NO opposition to their EVIL laws.</p>
<p>The regimes are now taxing / borrowing / spending about 40 percent of the GDP &#8212; for the benefit mainly of such special interest gangs.</p>
<p>P.R. and nonpartisan A.V.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

