<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ACLU Files Lawsuit Against Three Nebraska Ballot Access Restrictions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/12/16/aclu-files-lawsuit-against-three-nebraska-ballot-access-restrictions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/12/16/aclu-files-lawsuit-against-three-nebraska-ballot-access-restrictions/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 10:13:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=765</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Demo Rep</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/12/16/aclu-files-lawsuit-against-three-nebraska-ballot-access-restrictions/comment-page-1/#comment-782076</link>
		<dc:creator>Demo Rep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 02:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=9548#comment-782076</guid>
		<description>Any genius ACLU lawyers capable of detecting that --

SEPARATE IS NOT EQUAL.

Brown v. Bd of Ed 1954 -- NOT brought up in Williams v. Rhodes and ALL of the later ballot access cases in the Supremes due to armies of MORON lawyers.

Each election is NEW and has ZERO to do with any prior election.

P.R. and A.V. -- before it is too late and the arrogant EVIL party hack incumbent MONSTERS cause Civil WAR II and/or World WAR III with a standard *intolerable* law.

See the 1773 Tea Act and the 1854 Kansas-Nebraska Act.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any genius ACLU lawyers capable of detecting that &#8211;</p>
<p>SEPARATE IS NOT EQUAL.</p>
<p>Brown v. Bd of Ed 1954 &#8212; NOT brought up in Williams v. Rhodes and ALL of the later ballot access cases in the Supremes due to armies of MORON lawyers.</p>
<p>Each election is NEW and has ZERO to do with any prior election.</p>
<p>P.R. and A.V. &#8212; before it is too late and the arrogant EVIL party hack incumbent MONSTERS cause Civil WAR II and/or World WAR III with a standard *intolerable* law.</p>
<p>See the 1773 Tea Act and the 1854 Kansas-Nebraska Act.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. Frank Robinson</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/12/16/aclu-files-lawsuit-against-three-nebraska-ballot-access-restrictions/comment-page-1/#comment-782073</link>
		<dc:creator>D. Frank Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 01:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=9548#comment-782073</guid>
		<description>More open ballot access threatens deeply entrenched interests. I wonder if this ACLU activity has anything to do with a major donor withholding millions in funding? Naw, stuff like that never happens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More open ballot access threatens deeply entrenched interests. I wonder if this ACLU activity has anything to do with a major donor withholding millions in funding? Naw, stuff like that never happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregg Jocoy</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/12/16/aclu-files-lawsuit-against-three-nebraska-ballot-access-restrictions/comment-page-1/#comment-782072</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregg Jocoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 00:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=9548#comment-782072</guid>
		<description>The ACLU, Greenpeace and the Green Party are the only groups I donate to regularly.  Of course, I subscribe to BAN, as should everyone, but if you care about ballot access, you could do worse than to drop a few bucks to the ACLU.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ACLU, Greenpeace and the Green Party are the only groups I donate to regularly.  Of course, I subscribe to BAN, as should everyone, but if you care about ballot access, you could do worse than to drop a few bucks to the ACLU.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ballot Access News: ACLU Files Lawsuit Against Three Nebraska Ballot Access Restrictions &#124; Independent Political Report</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/12/16/aclu-files-lawsuit-against-three-nebraska-ballot-access-restrictions/comment-page-1/#comment-782069</link>
		<dc:creator>Ballot Access News: ACLU Files Lawsuit Against Three Nebraska Ballot Access Restrictions &#124; Independent Political Report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 23:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=9548#comment-782069</guid>
		<description>[...] Posted at Ballot Access News: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Posted at Ballot Access News: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

