<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Applicants to California Redistricting Commission Broken Down by Political Party Membership</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/12/19/applicants-to-california-redistricting-commission-broken-down-by-political-party-membership/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/12/19/applicants-to-california-redistricting-commission-broken-down-by-political-party-membership/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 13:28:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1650</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Seidenberg</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/12/19/applicants-to-california-redistricting-commission-broken-down-by-political-party-membership/comment-page-1/#comment-782276</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Seidenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 16:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=9594#comment-782276</guid>
		<description>Richard,

What you called independent voters are really electors that declined to state at the time of registration a
political party or political body.  Independent voter
is just the wrong term.  Some of these people have picked at primary day a party, viz., Democrat, Republican, or American Independent under S. B. 28.
Because of what happened in Los Angeles County in the
Presidental Primary of 2008, viz., counting AIP voters
as votes for Obama, the AIP current view is we will
not join in any voter fraud as took place in Los Angeles
County in February, 2008.  Therefore, the AIP State Central Committee may stop its rights under S. B. 28.

If any AIP elector has a view on S. B. 28, please post
here, because I will share these posts at the State Central Committee meeting of AIP, prior to our vote.

Sincerely, Mark Seidenberg, Vice Chairman, American
Independent Party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard,</p>
<p>What you called independent voters are really electors that declined to state at the time of registration a<br />
political party or political body.  Independent voter<br />
is just the wrong term.  Some of these people have picked at primary day a party, viz., Democrat, Republican, or American Independent under S. B. 28.<br />
Because of what happened in Los Angeles County in the<br />
Presidental Primary of 2008, viz., counting AIP voters<br />
as votes for Obama, the AIP current view is we will<br />
not join in any voter fraud as took place in Los Angeles<br />
County in February, 2008.  Therefore, the AIP State Central Committee may stop its rights under S. B. 28.</p>
<p>If any AIP elector has a view on S. B. 28, please post<br />
here, because I will share these posts at the State Central Committee meeting of AIP, prior to our vote.</p>
<p>Sincerely, Mark Seidenberg, Vice Chairman, American<br />
Independent Party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Riley</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/12/19/applicants-to-california-redistricting-commission-broken-down-by-political-party-membership/comment-page-1/#comment-782190</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Riley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 00:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=9594#comment-782190</guid>
		<description>About 1/3 are from the Sacramento area (Sacramento, El Dorado, Placer, Yolo)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About 1/3 are from the Sacramento area (Sacramento, El Dorado, Placer, Yolo)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trent Hill</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/12/19/applicants-to-california-redistricting-commission-broken-down-by-political-party-membership/comment-page-1/#comment-782182</link>
		<dc:creator>Trent Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 18:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=9594#comment-782182</guid>
		<description>Looks like the four non-major party representatives will likely be 2 independents, an AIPer, and a Libertarian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like the four non-major party representatives will likely be 2 independents, an AIPer, and a Libertarian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Demo Rep</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/12/19/applicants-to-california-redistricting-commission-broken-down-by-political-party-membership/comment-page-1/#comment-782174</link>
		<dc:creator>Demo Rep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 17:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=9594#comment-782174</guid>
		<description>One more total evil FRAUD.

Half the votes in half the gerrymander districts = about 25 percent ANTI-Democracy minority rule -- no matter who or what is making the gerrymander districts -- no matter how square and beautiful looking the gerrymander districts appear on the CA State map.

P.R. and A.V. -- regardless of ALL MORON *fixes* like the CRC fix.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more total evil FRAUD.</p>
<p>Half the votes in half the gerrymander districts = about 25 percent ANTI-Democracy minority rule &#8212; no matter who or what is making the gerrymander districts &#8212; no matter how square and beautiful looking the gerrymander districts appear on the CA State map.</p>
<p>P.R. and A.V. &#8212; regardless of ALL MORON *fixes* like the CRC fix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: natural born citizen party</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2009/12/19/applicants-to-california-redistricting-commission-broken-down-by-political-party-membership/comment-page-1/#comment-782172</link>
		<dc:creator>natural born citizen party</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 17:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=9594#comment-782172</guid>
		<description>Jerry Brown is advocate for continued ACORN roll in census/ voter registration efforts in CA.

see Strunk v US DOC (Census) USDC-DC 09-1295

see also Forjone v CA (HAVA) USDC-NYND 06-1002</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jerry Brown is advocate for continued ACORN roll in census/ voter registration efforts in CA.</p>
<p>see Strunk v US DOC (Census) USDC-DC 09-1295</p>
<p>see also Forjone v CA (HAVA) USDC-NYND 06-1002</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

