<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Carbon-Paper Petitioning Case Finally Gets Oral Argument</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ballot-access.org/2010/03/10/carbon-paper-petitioning-case-finally-gets-oral-argument/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2010/03/10/carbon-paper-petitioning-case-finally-gets-oral-argument/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 05:30:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=8124</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quick Embellishments for Kids Clothing</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2010/03/10/carbon-paper-petitioning-case-finally-gets-oral-argument/comment-page-1/#comment-787413</link>
		<dc:creator>Quick Embellishments for Kids Clothing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 22:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=11125#comment-787413</guid>
		<description>[...] Ballot Access News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Carbon-Paper Petitioning Case Finally Gets Oral Argu... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ballot Access News &raquo; Blog Archive &raquo; Carbon-Paper Petitioning Case Finally Gets Oral Argu&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whoa!</title>
		<link>http://www.ballot-access.org/2010/03/10/carbon-paper-petitioning-case-finally-gets-oral-argument/comment-page-1/#comment-786567</link>
		<dc:creator>Whoa!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 20:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ballot-access.org/?p=11125#comment-786567</guid>
		<description>This one should fail.

Using carbon paper to obtain signatures for separate ballot initiatives should not be allowed.

Yeah, sure, you might &quot;be prepared&quot; to allow voters to sign only one.  But, we know that paid circulators, and others seeking to finish a petitioning project quickly, will be strongly tempted to place the most popular petition on top and forget to mention the ones below, and just accumulate the carbon signatures.

The use of carbon copies should NOT be allowed for separate petitions.


Here is a case where freedom and free elections will be protected if the judge rules against the petitioners.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This one should fail.</p>
<p>Using carbon paper to obtain signatures for separate ballot initiatives should not be allowed.</p>
<p>Yeah, sure, you might &#8220;be prepared&#8221; to allow voters to sign only one.  But, we know that paid circulators, and others seeking to finish a petitioning project quickly, will be strongly tempted to place the most popular petition on top and forget to mention the ones below, and just accumulate the carbon signatures.</p>
<p>The use of carbon copies should NOT be allowed for separate petitions.</p>
<p>Here is a case where freedom and free elections will be protected if the judge rules against the petitioners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

