The Philadelphia Inquirer of March 11 has this editorial, focusing attention on the fact that the challenge to Ralph Nader’s 2004 Pennsylvania petition was illegally carried out with state resources and state employees. Petition challenges in Pennsylvania are brought by private individuals, yet the people who challenged Nader’s petition used government assets. Nader is still being asked to pay approximately $80,000 to the people who challenged his petition.
The editorial also scolds the Pennsylvania Attorney General for accepting campaign contributions from the law firm that represented the challengers.
“None of this absolves the Nader campaign for obtaining fraudulent signatures in 2004”. AH! EXCEPT FOR THE FACT THAT THE NADER CAMPAIGN WAS SABOTAGED BY DEMOCRAT PARTY SABOTEURS WHO INTENTIONALLY SIGNED FAULTS NAMES LIKE “MICKEY MOUSE” AND “DONALD DUCK” ON TO PETITIONS, THEREBY RUINING THE REST OF THE VALIDLY SIGNED VOTERS SIGNATURES ON PETITION FORMS. AND THE JUDGES ARE CULPABLE TOO! THEY KNOW VERY WELL THAT SOMEONE TRYING TO SUBMIT FORGED FALSE NAMES ON PETITIONS WOULDN’T SIGN THEM WITH SUCH OUTWARDLY RIDICULOUS NAMES. THE PENNSYLVANIA COURT WAS ONLY TOO HAPPY TO GET RALPH NADER OFF THE BALLOT AND TEACH HIM A LESSON. THERE WAS EVEN VOTERS WHO VOTED FOR NADER ON VALID ABSENTEE BALLOTS THAT HAD NADER LISTED AND THE COURT THREW OUT THOSE AFFIRMATIVE VOTES FREELY VOTED BY CITZEN VOTERS. THEREBY STRIPPING THE VOTES OF VALID VOTERS, VOTING FOR WHOM THEY WANTED TOO. IS THIS AMERICA FOLKS? SEBASTIAN MCGARIGLE PS: THE POLITICAL PARTIES DON’T WANT YOU TO BE ABLE TO VOTE FOR WHOM YOU WANT TOO.
Amen!
I submitted a copy of my above comments to the Philadelphia Inquirer article referred and linked to, above. They failed to publish them. SEb
This was a crime and was a scene that no other I experience
I participated in this voter’s suppose fraud recall.
Nader was sabotaged and I will not back down from this!!
Release his money and let him do his work no one else is out there doing it!!!
And again say “Amen”. It takes more than a village to save a democratic republic. And don’t think only a few states commit election fraud; those in the news are the only places where the problem has been exposed by alert and intelligent citizens. Patriots in the deep South, take notice.
There was a letter in response to that editorial printed in today’s Inquirer. It was very favorable to Nader.
Pingback: New Philadelphia Inquirer Editorial on Use of State Resources in Challenge to Nader 2004 Petition | Independent Political Report
Pingback: New Philadelphia Inquirer Editorial on Use of State Resources in Challenge to Nader 2004 Petition | Lawyer Don Hecker Word