Home General Hearing Held in Lawsuit by Voters in Kinston, North Carolina, Who Want Non-Partisan City Elections
formats

Hearing Held in Lawsuit by Voters in Kinston, North Carolina, Who Want Non-Partisan City Elections

Published on December 7, 2010, by in General.

On December 3, U.S. District Court Judge John D. Bates, a Bush Jr. appointee, held a hearing in Laroque v Holder, 10-0561.  The case is in federal court in Washington, D.C.  See this story.

In 2008, the voters of Kinston, North Carolina, voted to change the city’s elections from partisan elections to non-partisan elections.  The Voting Rights Section of the U.S. Justice Department refused to approve the change.  North Carolina is under section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, which means that when an election law or practice is changed, the Voting Rights Department must approve the change.  Alternatively, the Voting Rights Act permits a covered jurisdiction to ask a federal court in Washington, D.C., to approve the change.

Kinston has a black majority, and the Voting Rights Section felt that a switch from partisan elections to non-partisan elections would harm black voters.  The city council of Kinston has not been willing to challenge the decision of the Voting Rights Section.  So, on April 7, 2010, five Kinston voters sued the Attorney General of the United States, alleging that section 5 of the Voting Rights Act is unconstitutional.  The Attorney General’s response is that individual voters do not have standing to do that.  Judge Bates is expected to rule quickly on whether the case may proceed.  One of the plaintiffs, Klay Northrup, is registered as an independent voter.  The case alleges that he is harmed by the failure of the Justice Department to let Kinston have non-partisan elections.  He says he would like to run for city council.  As an independent, he cannot run without a petition of 4% of the number of registered voters.  But, if the city had non-partisan elections, no such burdensome petition would exist for him or any other candidate.

3 Responses

  1. […] on December 7, 2010 by News Feed By Richard Winger | Ballot Access News | December 7, 2010 (Original Context) On December 3, U.S. District Court Judge John D. Bates, a Bush Jr. appointee, held a hearing in […]

  2. Demo Rep

    The VRA is one more giant perversion of a part of the Constitution — i.e. 15th Amdt, Sec. 1 — to be read in connection with 14th Amdt, Sec. 2.

    P.R. in ALL regimes before it is too late.
    The EVIL forces of monarchy/oligarchy are always attacking.

  3. Demo Rep

    One more case of EVIL elitist Donkey racism — assuming that black voters have NO brains and must only vote for Donkey candidates FOREVER.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>