Arkansas Libertarian Party Petition Has Enough Valid Signatures

On June 16, the Arkansas Secretary of State determined that the Libertarian Party petition for party status has enough valid signatures. The party had submitted 16,000 to meet a requirement of 10,000. The validity rate was approximately 75%.

Before 1971, Arkansas did not require any petition for a party to become ballot-qualified. Since then, the other only parties that have ever successfully petitioned for party status in Arkansas have been the Reform Party in 1996, and the Green Party in 2006, 2008, and 2010.

Arkansas removes parties from the ballot unless they poll 3% for the office at the top of the ticket in each election (president in presidential years, and Governor in midterm years). This law has never permitted any party to keep its status, except that in 1996, the Reform Party met that test and also appeared automatically on the 1998 ballot. The Green Party is currently waiting for the 8th circuit to rule in its lawsuit against the 3% retention test.

Arkansas has a far easier ballot access procedure for parties that just want to be on the ballot for President. That petition only requires 1,000 signatures, and until today, that is the only petition that the Libertarian Party had ever used in Arkansas. Arkansas is the only state in which the Libertarian Party has never placed any nominees on the general election ballot, other than its presidential nominees. There are no statewide offices (other than President) up in Arkansas in 2012, but it is expected that the Libertarians will have candidates for U.S. House and state legislature.


Comments

Arkansas Libertarian Party Petition Has Enough Valid Signatures — 7 Comments

  1. Yea! I am so looking forward to being able to vote for LP candidates below the presidential line next year in Arkansas. 🙂

  2. Pingback: Arkansas Libertarian Party Petition Has Enough Valid Signatures | ThirdPartyPolitics.us

  3. What is the cost to have a PROPERLY DONE ballot access case about —

    Separate is NOT equal.

    Brown v. Bd of Ed 1954

    What allows separate and UN-equal ballot access laws — other than the party hack robot SCOTUS folks ???

  4. #6 What in the world are you talking about? Brown v. Board of Education declared that state laws establishing segregated schools for blacks and whites was illegal. That has nothing to do with ballot access or this news story whatsoever.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.