Georgia Administrative Law Judge Determines that President Obama Meets the Qualifications to be President

On February 3, an administrative law judge in Georgia ruled that President Obama’s name should be left on the Georgia Democratic presidential primary. The 10-page decision finds that the witnesses who testified that President Obama was not born in Hawaii did not establish any credentials as experts. He also ruled that “natural born citizen” means anyone (with very limited exceptions) who was born in the United States.


Comments

Georgia Administrative Law Judge Determines that President Obama Meets the Qualifications to be President — No Comments

  1. One more case for SCOTUS — to clean up one long time super-mess ???

    How about armies of barbarian invaders in the U.S.A. with their camp followers/ sex slave women having kids born in the U.S.A. ???

    Are such kids NBC — subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S.A. regime ??? Yeah. Sure.

  2. The lizard people have claimed another Georgia Administrative Law judge. First they rule against me in my fight to avoid mowing the lawn and now this. Wake up sheeple.

  3. #1 Demo: The Wong Kim Ark case, upon which this Georgia decision relies, says that children of enemy aliens born in the U.S. would not be citizens of the U.S. Thus, the children of Grignr of the Norgolian Empire could not become President.

  4. It took 2 major acts of the gerrymander Congress to naturalize the surviving members of American Indian tribes in 1924 and 1940 after the genocide attacks against them from 1607 to about 1890.

    How many folks on this list have read the 1866 Senate debates that produced Sentence 1 of 14th Amdt, Sec. 1 — regardless of anything in 1776-1868 ???

    The lazy MORON lawyers who do these NBC cases certainly have NOT — result more and more JUNK opinions — due to HORRIFIC bad research — and brain dead lack of thinking about basic NATION-STATE ALLEGIANCE stuff.

    # 4 How about mere sex slaves and girl friends of Mexican killer drug gangs

    — ILLEGALLY brought 3 feet into the U.S.A. and have kids born on a bedsheet or towel on U.S.A. dirt ??? — with poltically correct GPS tracking stuff, DNA tests, etc.

    — to verify the time and place of birth.
    ——-
    See the 1878 Revised Statutes regarding citizenship and naturalization — look for ALLEGIANCE and FATHER.

    If John and very pregnant Mary Q. U.S.A. citizens on a tourist trip to Mexico have a kid born on Mexico dirt, is such kid a NBC U.S.A. or a NBC Mexican ???

    Sorry — NOT quite a ONE world government where mere nation-state regimes mean nothing — but the usual suspects are working 24/7 for such a ONE world govt.

  5. # 4 The Wong Kim Ark folks are about the same folks who wrote Plessy v. Ferguson — OK to have racist separate is allegedly equal stuff — OVER-RULED in

    Brown v Bd of Ed 1954.

    —-
    History – the 1700s Brits had *transportation* OUT of Britain as an option for convicted Felons (who otherwise would be HUNG until dead).

    See the formation of Australia — lots of Brit felons, male and female, shipped to Aussie land — to populate the colony.
    ——-
    Gee – if a boatland of FELON Brit pregnant women were ship-wrecked on a U.S.A. shoreline would the kids born in the U.S.A. be NBC of the U.S.A. ???

    More – the old Brit regime had some Dark Age NO EXIT from England stuff regarding their subjects / serfs — without the permission of the regime — i.e. such serfs might be needed to be cannon fodder in a regime war.

    If a foreign folk is legally in the U.S.A. can the U.S.A. legally prevent such foreign folk from leaving the U.S.A. — to go back to his/her foreign nation regime ???

    The Wong opinion AND dissent BOTH fail to quote ALL of the relevant language in the 1866 debate in the Senate about the citizenship sentence.

    Such is the HORRIFIC bad level of reasearch on BASIC stuff.

  6. #8 fogbow associate, I assume

    Thank you for following this nbc ballot access POTUS candidate eligibility effort here at BAN, next week in Albany (NY) may yet prove to be of interest to your organization.

  7. If John and very pregnant Mary Q. U.S.A. citizens on a tourist trip to Mexico have a kid born on Mexico dirt, is such kid a NBC U.S.A. or a NBC Mexican ?

    Both, and stop discriminating against ABC, CBS, PBS, Fox, the cable stations, etc. LOL

  8. 10 –

    Will we see in Albany, NY the same ridiculous “Foxpert” witnesses who were just laughed out of court in Georgia?

  9. Always interesting to see the number of New Age flippant MORONS on this list — adding zero legal research.

    About like the number of New Age gerrymander MONSTERS in the Congress and in each State legislature.

  10. BHO eligibility is all about illegal alien amnesty in that anyone born on soil without regard to the citizen status is being poushed by the Dems and Reps as NBC,

  11. The question is — what was the nation-state allegiance status of BHO the second he was born ??? — WHERE EVER he was physically born.

    Was BHO’s father a British citizen/subject the second that BHO was born ???

    Birth certificates generally do NOT list nation-state allegiance stuff of the parents of a kid.

    What percentage of folks in 3rd/4th world areas have NO birth certificates ???

  12. call Brian Kemp, sec of state of GA at 404-656-2871, fax 404-656-0513 to voice your 2012 POTUS/CINC eligibility ballot access concerns

  13. I’m not even an Obama supporter, but this natural born caucasian nonsense is just embarrassing.

  14. # 28 Sorry — NBC is ALL about ALLEGIANCE and *modern* nation-states formed during the Middle/Dark Age — regardless of any skin color (or colour for Brits).

    NBC or Naturalized father >>> NBC kids — in ALL regimes — U.S.A. and foreign — separate U.S.A. NBC and foreign NBC.

    How about looking up the oath that new U.S.A. naturalized citizens have taking since the early 1800s regarding ALLEGIANCE ???

    How many folks on this list had/have a male ancestor who took a 1776-1789 oath of allegiance to one of the 13 original States/Vermont or a later 1790-2012 U.S.A. law-naturalization oath ???

    And of course how many ILLEGAL aliens are on this list ??? — technically foreign ENEMY invaders.

    NO such thing as nation-state dual citizenship — See Art. III, Sec. 2 regarding foreign citizens/subjects in Fed courts.

  15. 28 –

    No more than embarrassing than the first administration of an Arab wetback.

  16. When George Romney ran in 1968, did anyone give a rat’s ass that he was born in Mexico? Not that I know of.

  17. 32 –

    Then why do you find NaturalBornCitizen’s posts embarrassing? He’s right on the montye in my opinion.

  18. assuming SCOTUS finally engages the NBC question and let’s say DemRep is correct and no matter where the candidate was “birthed”, the nation state status of the parents (including the document “legal father” acknowledged at the birth) will prevail as the SCOTUS “definition” — Keegan and Sotomayor excluded since BO obviously will obviously not be NBC — BUT then McCain and even on this high holy Super Bowl football day TIM TEBOW born in the PI will be NBC POTUS/CINC eligible for a write in draft as 2012 POTUS candidate — all this advised and coordinated exclusively introduced to the world by BAN’s own ballot access expert Richard Winger.

  19. — except of course Tim Tebow is not yet old enough (35 yo) for a POTUS draft, but SCOTUS may redefine that away as well

  20. Until Alaska became a state in 1959, certain native Alaskan persons born there had a class of citizenship less than that
    of a native born citizenship. Therefore, just because a person was born in the United States to United States Citizen
    Parents prior to Alaska Statehood does not all the time make
    then Natural Born Citizens.

    Case in point. In an article entitled “STATEHOOD MEANT CITIZENSHIP FOR SOME ALASKA RESIDENTS” in the January 12, 2009 issue the NATIVE TIMES. It talked about an Alaskan
    Native that was a naturalized Alaska Citizen under the Act
    of 1915, by the Alaska Legislature, who tried to enter the
    United States from a short visit to Baja California, Mexico.
    He had with him is California Driver License, Certificate
    of Naturalization by the United States Court of Alaska under
    the Act of 1915, an Alaskan Birth Certificate, yet since he
    was born into the Tlingit Tribe of Indians, the Border Patrol
    held up his entry back into California. This practice ended
    against Alaska natives once it became a state in 1959.

    The AIP is running Walter Nayakik of Alaska who was born in
    Alaska in 1952 to two Alaska born Eskimos that became United
    States Citizens under a collective naturalization act that became effective in January, 1941, for POTUS.

    We at AIP are also running one other Alaska Native Yupik Eskimo who was born after Alaska Statehood named Todd Palin, husband of the former Governor. Mr. Palin is an independent
    voter and was an elector in the Alaska Independence Party.

    He has never been a Republican.

    Sincerely, Mark Seidenberg, Chairman, American Independent Party of California

  21. Thank you 72 blow frogs 69.

    Or as you might say, Thank you LXXII blow frogs LXIX.

  22. 47 –

    “Fogbow”

    Mr. Ed adds a second trick to his repertoire. Congratulations!

    Add a few more and you might actually simulate objective, critical thought.

  23. @ 47 Blow frogs and hallucinate.

    Oops, you must already be doing that, LOL, that would explain your birther psychotic nonsense ravings.

  24. @57/58 Sheesh, a one track mind is a terrible thing to waste.

    I know you are fogbow but what am I? LOL

  25. Well fogbow, it’s been loads of fun and all, but it looks like this will be off the front page soon. At that point you can go fog bow yourself.

  26. @63 But fogbow, you have been here all along.

    You are the fogbow in the twisted mirror behind your eyelids.

  27. @65 How many times are you going to keep thanking yourself fogbow? Thank you fogbow!

    Seriously though, thanks for repeating fogbow like a mantra so many times that I finally googled it and found thefogbow.com, which is an excellent site dealing with frogturds like the neutrally born cockazoid soiree.

  28. When foreign new areas were added to the U.S.A. regime (starting with the 1803 Louisiana Territory) the Congress generally enacted *general* naturalization laws for the residents in such added areas who had ALLEGIANCE to the U.S.A. regime.

    See the U.S. Code 1926 edition for a listing of many of the early group naturalizations.

    The children of ALL of such folks became NBC — with their children becoming NBC.

    ALLEGIANCE to a nation-state regime. SOOOOOO difficult to understand — by legal history MORONS.

    Will HF and NBCP take their comedy act/routine on the road – or even perhaps on cable TV ???

  29. #67
    Thank you — and it is on the road and cable TV — video made in Brooklyn yesterday will be posted on new threads of BAN regarding nbc ballot access issues as soon as video is available.

  30. 66 –

    NBCP is, as I have said before, a one trick pony. I’ve given him too much credit by calling him “Mr. Ed.” The real Mr. Ed had much more to offer in the way of intelligent observations on issues of the day. NBCP, and his cohorts, have only one thing to offer, and it is this…”We’re upset that we lost the election to an urban liberal. We’re so upset, in fact, that we’ve deluded ourselves into believing that he really SHOULDN’T be our president. And here’s our proof.”

    The problem is, of course, that any time their “proof” has been laid before any judge, any magistrate, any objective observer, it’s been shown to be void of substance. Every single time. They’re 0 for everything so far, and it will stay that way no matter how many other states they take their baseless claims to.

    Many states – same trick. It’s “spreading” all right. Like mold.

    So here, Mr. Ed…I’ll do your trick for you…

    Frodo.

    Oops. That’s from another piece of fiction, isn’t it?

    Fogbow.

    There. Got it right this time.

  31. #74
    Thank you FogBow
    The GA SOS should make some sort of decision today and BAN/Richard will undoubtedly blog the item and I feel certain you will continue your defense of 2012 and 2008 BO (and other GOP/SWP el al) non-nbc POTUS / Ballot access.

  32. I am the only attorney, who actually filed an appeal with the Secretary of State of GA Brian Kemp, he is reviewing it now. Other 2 attorneys are planning to appeal, but so far my appeal is the only known appeal of Malihi’s decision | Dr. Orly Taitz, Esqui

    http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=31271

  33. The definition of birther insanity:

    Present the same crank legal theories, the same old internet ‘rumors’ and internet self proclaimed ‘expert’ testimony over and over again and expect the results to be different!!!

    train111

  34. TO: Demo Rep for Post # 67.

    It was some times, but not always. I believe you are looking for “collective naturalization act” as a term of art.

    Let’s take the events dealing with the remainder of the Territory of Michigan, viz. the Washington Islands (south of
    Alaska). Congress did pass the Garfield Act of 1877 to give
    Citizenship, because the Washington Islands were also part of
    “Oregon Country”. As you may recall there was an (and still
    is a territorial dispute over islands along the North West Pacific Coast, between Vancouver Island and South Alaska
    that was never settled between the United States and the
    United Kingdom.

    In 1851 the United Kingdom created a colony over the United
    States islands territory (remainder of the incorpotated Territory of Michigan). This was at the time (circa, 1850) that Queen Victoria’s Royal Navy annexed several islands North of Russian America mainland (known since 1868 as “Alaska”)with the name of “Plover Group”. The United States general government placed the Washington Islands in Oregon Country. Citizenship was not settled until Congress
    passed the Garfield Act in 1877. Because of the Crows Nest
    Pass Agreement, Canada claims the Washington Islands as a counter claim against the United States as part of British
    Columbia.

    In 1938 the issues were raised a new by S. W. Boggs (Geographer of the Department of State) at a meeting in Ottawa. Then in 1959 W.A.C. “Wacky” Bennett, Prime Minister
    of British Columbia, asked Ike about the Plover Group North
    of the Alaska mainland at the time Alaska became a state.
    This issue was not on any agenda, so Ike did not know what
    “Wacky Bennett” was talking about. Bennett wanted to place
    the Plover Group of islands in British Columbia.

    It was from British Columbia that Stanley Ann Obama took BHO II into Washington State, just prior to her starting classes
    at the University of Washington Extention, at Seattle on September 25, 1961. Stanley Ann Obama and BHO II arrived on
    September 20, 1961 at Tilbury Docks, Port of London, aboard
    the S.S. Uganda from Mombasa Island (departing on August 28,
    1961 at 24 days of age). During that five day gap Stanley Ann Obama and BHO II flew between London and Montreal on a BOAC flight and crossed an open border from Canada to the United States (viz., State of Washington from British Columbia)without a lawful entry. Stanley Ann Obama was in
    Kenya on August 19, 1961 (a Saturday) when she was excepted
    into classes at UW Extention. Admission was done by mail and not in person, because the Extention office was closed to the walk-in public on Saturday, August 19, 1961. Jerome Corsi missed that on August 19, 1961 was a Saturday, so admission to extention on that day were only processing mail applications.

    Sincerely, Mark Seidenberg, Chairman, American Independent Party

  35. Note a typo in post # 79. It should state “accepted” and not
    the wrong word “excepted”. Stanley Ann Obama started classes
    at UW Extention at Seattle on September 25, 1961. This was
    at a time that BOH I was in Honolulu as a student at the University of Hawai’i.

    Sincerely, Mark Seidenberg, Chairman, American Independent Party

  36. 76 –

    Good idea!

    I just filed my own appeal with the Border Collie who lives next door. As far as I know I’m the only chimney sweep who filed with “Rexie.”

    I’ll let you know how my appeal goes if you report on the success of yours.

    Bogsnot!

  37. 76 –

    Update…

    Rexie told me

    “Woof woof…woof woof woof woof, fake evidence…ruff, ruff, lying Foxperts, bark bark bark…get off my lawn you raving, self-deluded lying human.”

    So…how did your appeal go?

  38. 72 –

    Keep up the fight my friend.

    Maybe people will wake up when the whole government is being run by al Qaeda. They’ve got the White House. They want more.

  39. Pingback: DNA Genetics

  40. Time to take America back for Americans. The best place to start is in the White House.

    Get Barak Husain Obama out now!

  41. So Sheriff Joe sets a D-Day. Another aha!! moment for the birther movement when Obama will be marched out of the White House and into Leavenworth.
    My prediction–the day will come and go just like the other 547 birther aha!! days and nothing will happen–then birthers can set up for their 548th aha!! moment when again nothing will happen.

    train111

  42. Sheriff Bugs Bunny issued a press release today, announcing that shortly after Sheriff Joe discloses the results of his investigation into the citizenship of Barack Obama, he will release the results of his own investigation into the citizenship of Yosemite Sam. Sheriff Bugs disputes Mr. Sam’s claim of U.S. citizenship, citing numerous USSC cases to support his claim that cartoon characters, whether naturally born or not, cannot be deemed American citizens.

    He also issued the following personal challenge to Mr. Sam:

    “I dare you to step over that line.”

    To which Mr. Sam replied “Oh yeah? Well I’m a-steppin’.”

    When told of this exchange, NaturalBornCitizenParty said “Fogbow.”

    Asked what that meant, NaturalBornCitizenParty responded “Fogbow.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.