On August 2, the U.S. Court of Appeals issued an opinion in Nader v Federal Election Commission, 12-5134. The opinion says Nader doesn’t have standing to complain that the FEC did not enforce the campaign finance laws in 2004. Specifically, Nader demonstrated that the people who challenged his ballot access in 2004 spent millions of dollars on that effort, and none of the people who spent that money ever reported it as a donation to the Democratic Party or the John Kerry presidential campaign. Although everyone agrees with Nader’s accusation, the FEC did nothing about the Nader complaint (although the FEC took several years to make the determination that it would do nothing) and now the D.C. Circuit says Nader lacks standing.
The D.C. Circuit implied that if Nader were running for president in the next election, then he would have standing. The opinion is only six pages long.